Why does using typeof() to create a weak reference does not require a pointer asterisk?

Question

I was searching a bit about the difference between __weak and __block

• What is the difference between a __weak and a __block reference?

• To ARC or not to ARC? What are the pros and cons?

  and found that if I am using ARC, I should use __weak references in blocks.

My old code was something like this:

__block GWTSDemandContactsController *safeMe = self;

[GWTSService getSuggestedContactsForDemand:self.demand success:^(NSArray *contacts) {
    safeMe.activityLoading.hidden = true;
    [safeMe setContactsForView:contacts];
} failure:^(NSError *error) {
    safeMe.activityLoading.hidden = true;
}];

Then when I migrated to use ARC, I started using __weak and also found out that I could use typeof(self)

• Generic typeof for weak self references

This is very simple, so that I don't have to write the name of the class every time I want to save the self reference. So now my code looks like this:

__weak typeof(self) safeMe = self;

But why do we avoid the * here? Shouldn't it be a reference to self ? What are we storing here by avoiding the * ?

I don't know if I am missing something or not, but I could not understand this.

Answer 1

This doesn't have anything to do with the ownership specifiers. It's just that typeof(self) is already a pointer, because self 's type is "pointer to GWTSDemandContactsController", ie, GWTSDemandContactsController * . The fully-written-out type includes the * .

The object pointed to is a GWTSDemandContactsController , but the variable self is a pointer to that object.