[英]sets in Z3 theorem prover
我有一份合金声明
sig Card{}
sig ATM {card : disj set Card}
然后像这样将其转换为Z3:
1- (declare-sort ATM)
2- (declare-fun isATM (ATM) Bool)
3- (declare-sort Card)
4- (declare-fun isCard (Card) Bool)
5- (declare-fun card (ATM Card) Bool)
6- (assert(forall ((c Card) (atm ATM)) (=> (card atm c) (and(isATM atm) (isCard c)))))
7- (declare-fun disjSetCard (ATM) Card)
8- (assert(forall ((atm ATM) (c Card)) (=> (card atm c)(= c(disjSetCard atm)))))
check sat
问题是,在第7行中,如何使函数disjSetCard
返回(disj set)
卡而不是一张Card。 请问我的代码正确还是有其他解决方案?
您可以使用返回集合的函数对关系进行编码:
(define-sort Set (T) (Array T Bool))
(declare-sort ATM)
(declare-sort Card)
(declare-fun ATMtoCard (ATM) (Set Card))
并使用以下方法约束ATM的不同成员的字段值不相交:
(forall ((a Card) (x ATM) (y ATM))
(=>
(and (select (ATMtoCard x) a) (select (ATMtoCard y) a))
(= x y)
))
对应于Alloy表达式:
all a: Card | all x, y: ATM |
a in x.card && a in y.card implies x = y
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.