为什么在 iOS 的 ViewController 中声明视图时在 Swift 中使用“weak”关键字

Question

以下在 ViewController 中设置视图的方法有什么区别

force-unwrapped ：

class VC: UIViewController() {
    var customView: UIView!

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        customView = UIView(frame: .zero)
        addSubview(customView)
    }
}

weak force-unwrapped ：

class VC: UIViewController() {
    weak var customView: UIView!

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        customView = UIView(frame: .zero)
        addSubview(customView)
    }
}

weak ：

class VC: UIViewController() {
    weak var customView: UIView

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        customView = UIView(frame: .zero)
        addSubview(customView)
    }
}

在声明中构造：

class VC: UIViewController() {
    var customView = UIView(frame: .zero)

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        addSubview(customView)
    }
}

声明中的weak构造

class VC: UIViewController() {
    weak var customView = UIView(frame: .zero))

    override func viewDidLoad() {
        super.viewDidLoad()
        addSubview(customView)
    }
}

Answer 1

可能是您的问题与 Xcode 创建网点有关：

@IBoutlet weak var label: UILabel!

Apple（和其他专家）已经讨论过是否应该在这里使用弱（因为这些视图几乎总是由view本身保留 - 我敢肯定，如果你四处挖掘，你会发现关于它的无休止的讨论。你通常会删除weak上面没有副作用（尝试并查看 - 在视图控制器dealloc添加日志消息。

但是，让我们来谈谈您的具体问题。 我在一个测试项目中做了一个小班（每个人想要探索这种话题时都应该这样做！）：

final class MemoryTest: NSObject {

    lazy var vc1 = VC1()
    lazy var vc2 = VC2()
    lazy var vc4 = VC4()
    lazy var vc5 = VC5()

    func test() {
        let _ = vc1
        let _ = vc2
//        let _ = vc3
        let _ = vc4
        let _ = vc5
    }
}

// What is the difference between the following methods of setting up views in a ViewController

// `force-unwrapped`:

/*
    Interoperability with Objective C required this.
    Any code accessing vc1 before its set will crash, forced unwrapped means that Swift will always try to unwrap what is
    otherwise an optional, and if nil boom down youg go.

    Since Objective C can deal with nil objects, you can access it and read properties, all of which will be nil
 */
    @objcMembers
    class VC1: UIViewController {
        var customView: UIView!

        init() {
            super.init(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)

            //print("BG Color 1", customView.backgroundColor)   // Compiler warning then a crash
            print("BG Color 2", customView?.backgroundColor ?? "none")   // crash
            customView = UIView(frame: .zero)
            view.addSubview(customView)
            customView = nil // the view is still there - its retained by your view, but your reference to it is gone
            //print("BG Color 3", customView.backgroundColor ?? "none")   // crash
        }
        required init?(coder: NSCoder) { // compiler forces this
            fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented")
        }
    }

//`weak force-unwrapped`:

    @objcMembers
    class VC2: UIViewController {
        weak var customView: UIView!

        init() {
            super.init(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)

            // customView = UIView(frame: .zero)   // Compiler error - cannot even build - compiler knows this will be released immediately
            view.addSubview(UIView(frame: .zero))   // view retains this newly added view
            customView = view.subviews.first        // since its retained already, we can reference it "weakly" (meaning its not further retained)

            customView.backgroundColor = .yellow
            print("Frame", customView.frame)
            customView.removeFromSuperview()        // since customView is weak, it got nilled with the view was released

            // immediate refernces still work - there is some delay until that customView actually gets dealloed
            print("CustomerView", String(format: "Pointer %p", customView)) // Still there ...

            DispatchQueue.main.async {
                if self.customView == .none {
                    print("Its gone now!")
                }
                //print("CustomerView", String(format: "Pointer %p", self.customView)) // Crash!
            }
        }
        required init?(coder: NSCoder) { // compiler forces this
            fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented")
        }
    }

//`weak`: this is an illegal syntax and you cannot compile it

//    class VC3: UIViewController {
//        weak var customView: UIView     // Compiler hard error, requires either a "!" or "?" suffix
//
//        init() {
//            super.init(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)
//
//            customView = UIView(frame: .zero)
//            view.addSubview(customView)
//        }
//        required init?(coder: NSCoder) { // compiler forces this
//            fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented")
//        }
//    }

//constructed in declaration:

    @objcMembers
    class VC4: UIViewController {
        var customView = UIView(frame: .zero)

        init() {
            super.init(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)

            print("Frame", customView.frame)    // fine - the view is constructed immediately, and since its "strong" the view persists until
                                                // dealloc.
            super.viewDidLoad()
            view.addSubview(customView)
        }
        required init?(coder: NSCoder) { // compiler forces this
            fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented")
        }
    }

//`weak` constructed in declaration

    @objcMembers
    class VC5: UIViewController {
        weak var customView = UIView(frame: .zero)  // Compiler warning, the view is instantiated, then immediately released.
        { didSet { if customView == nil { print("NIL !!!") } } }  // does not work - the change isn't ob

        init() {
            print("CUSTOMVIEW", customView?.frame ?? "already gone") // its gone

            super.init(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)

            print("CUSTOMVIEW", customView?.frame ?? "already gone") // its gone

            // At this point, customView was allocated, then immediately released as its not retained elsewhere
            super.viewDidLoad()
            //view.addSubview(customView!)    // Crash
        }
        required init?(coder: NSCoder) { // compiler forces this
            fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented")
        }
    }

但是，Objective C 并不关心这些。 这是引用所有这些类的另一个类：

@implementation ObjcTest

- (void)test {
    VC1 *vc1 = [VC1 new];
    NSLog(@"vc1 %@", vc1.customView);

    VC2 *vc2 = [VC2 new];
    NSLog(@"vc2 %@", vc2.customView);

    VC4 *vc4 = [VC4 new];
    NSLog(@"vc4 %@", vc4.customView);

    VC5 *vc5 = [VC5 new];
    NSLog(@"vc5 %@", vc5.customView);
}

@end

/* Console:

 2019-12-05 16:37:52.534537-0500 TableSelections[51189:30629412] vc1 (null)
 2019-12-05 16:37:52.537241-0500 TableSelections[51189:30629412] vc2 <UIView: 0x7fcc73c34230; frame = (0 0; 0 0);
    layer = <CALayer: 0x600000001140>>
 2019-12-05 16:37:52.537535-0500 TableSelections[51189:30629412] vc4 <UIView: 0x7fcc760019e0; frame = (0 0; 0 0);
    layer = <CALayer: 0x6000000244a0>>
 2019-12-05 16:37:52.537734-0500 TableSelections[51189:30629412] vc5 (null)
*/