记录F＃代码

Question

In a C# class with a single constructor, I can add class summary XML documentation and constructor XML documentation:

///<summary>
///This class will solve all your problems
///</summary>
public class Awesome
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Initializes a new instance of the <see cref="Awesome"/> class.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="sauce">The secret sauce.</param>       
    public Awesome(string sauce)
    {
        //...implementation elided for security purposes
    }
}

How do I do the same with the equivalent F# class such that the generated documentation is the same?

type Awesome(sauce: string) = 
    //...implementation elided for security purposes

CLARIFICATION: I'm aware that the standard XML documentation tags can be used in F#. My question is how to add them to the above snippet so that both the type and the constructor are documented.

Answer 1

I looked at the source of the open-source F# compiler and I think Dr_Asik is right - there is no way of documenting the implicit constructor with an XML comment. The node that represents the implicit constructor in the AST (See ImplicitCtor in ast.fs here ) does not include a field for stroing the XML documentation (represented as PreXmlDoc type).

You can still document all public API - you'd have to use the method that Dr_Asik mentioned and mark the implicit constructor as private . I agree this is a bit ugly, but I think it is more convenient than not using implicit constructors:

type MyType private(a:int, u:unit) =
  /// <summary>Creates MyType</summary>
  /// <param name="a">Parameter A</param>
  new(a:int) = MyType(a, ())

I added a dummy parameter u to the implicit constructor, so that it can be called from the public constructor. Anyway, I think this should be considered as a language bug and so I'd suggest reporting this to fsbugs at microsoft dot com .

As an aside, I think the XML documentation is mainly useful as a source of data for IntelliSense (which still needs documentation for the constructor, though) and I created some alternative F# tools that let you create tutorials and documentation by writing an F# script file with special comments using Markdown (there is a blog post about it ) - so you may consider that as a useful addition to the standard XML tooling.

Answer 2

In exactly the same way as you do in C#: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd233217.aspx

If you don't put any tags, F# assumes it is "summary":

/// This is the documentation
type MyType() = ....

... is equivalent to

/// <summary>This is the documentation</summary>
type MyType() = ...

If you want to document a constructor, you'll have to declare it explicitely. AFAIK there is no way to document the primary constructor.

/// [Type summary goes here]
type MyType(a : int) =
    let m_a = a
    /// [Parameterless constructor documentation here]
    new() = MyType(0)

Answer 3

There is no way to document the implicit constructor with an XML comment inside an F# source file (.fs). One workaround is to declare the constructor explicitly (see Dr Asik's answer). Another is to put your XML comments into an F# Signature File (.fsi).

File.fs:

module File

type Awesome(sauce: string) =
    member x.Sauce = sauce

File.fsi

module File

type Awesome =
  class
    /// Implicit constructor summary for the Awesome type
    new : sauce:string -> Awesome
    member Sauce : string
  end

The XML documentation for this assembly will now contain the correct summary:

<member name="M:File.Awesome.#ctor(System.String)">
<summary>
 Implicit constructor summary for the Awesome type
</summary>
</member>

Answer 4

This really is an annoying problem. Another solution I ended up using is to not rely on a primary constructor:

/// Documentation type.
type Awesome =
    val sauce : string
    /// <summary>Documentation constructor.</summary>
    /// <param name="sauce">Sauce. Lots of it.</param>
    new (sauce) = { sauce = sauce }

More verbose, but no extra files or private constructors needed...