[英]IDE for Clojure - Counterclockwise(Eclipse) vs Emacs. What (if any) features Counterclockwise is missing comparing to Emacs?
I want to know what are limitations of Counterclockwise plugin for Eclipse comparing to Emacs. 我想知道与Emacs相比,Eclipse的Counterclockwise插件有哪些限制。 What Lisp (and Clojure) magic will not be available from Eclipse?
Eclipse将无法提供什么Lisp(和Clojure)魔术?
-- UPDATE -- I know Emacs will have more features, shourtcuts, various sophisticated key bindings, but I am interested in specific Lisp/Clojure stuff. -更新-我知道Emacs将具有更多功能,快捷方式,各种复杂的键绑定,但是我对特定的Lisp / Clojure感兴趣。 For example if I couldn't use regexp search in files, it's fine, but if I couldn't use REPL inside Eclipse, it would be deal breaker for me - it's core feature.
例如,如果我不能在文件中使用正则表达式搜索,那很好,但是如果我不能在Eclipse中使用REPL,对我来说这将是一件麻烦事-它的核心功能。 So to expand my question, is REPL fully functional in Counterclockwise comparing to Emacs?
因此,扩大我的问题,与Emacs相比,REPL在逆时针功能是否完整? I don't mind, if some very advanced features are missing, that are just there for convenience, but if I can't do something, I will just jump to Emacs.
我不介意,如果缺少一些非常高级的功能,只是为了方便起见,但是如果我不能做某些事情,我将跳转到Emacs。
Counterclockwise has everything you need for a decent Clojure development experience. 逆时针提供了体面的Clojure开发经验所需的一切。
The things I find most useful (can't live without!) 我发现最有用的东西(不能没有!)
I'm pretty happy overall using Counterclockwise as my primary development environment. 总的来说,我很高兴使用Counterclockwise作为我的主要开发环境。 Not saying it's better than Emacs, but it certainly isn't lacking anything that is a deal-breaker.
并不是说它比Emacs更好,但是它肯定不缺少任何破坏交易的东西。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.