[英]Issue adding has_many to ActiveModel::Serializer
I've been trying to add has_many relationships to my ActiveModel::Serializers for a while now and I'm getting a bevy of errors related to them. 我已经尝试将has_many关系添加到我的ActiveModel :: Serializers已有一段时间了,并且我收到了很多与它们相关的错误。 It seems like the has_many relationships are calling the wrong serializer. 似乎has_many关系正在调用错误的序列化程序。 Here is the error: 这是错误:
Started GET "/vehicles/1001" for 127.0.0.1 at 2013-04-11 01:07:08 -0700
Processing by UsersController#index as JSON
Parameters: {"user"=>{}}
[1m[36mUser Load (0.2ms)[0m [1mSELECT `users`.* FROM `users` [0m
Processing by VehiclesController#show as JSON
Completed 200 OK in 1ms (Views: 0.2ms | ActiveRecord: 0.2ms)
Parameters: {"id"=>"1001", "vehicle"=>{}}
[1m[35mVehicle Load (0.6ms)[0m SELECT `vehicles`.* FROM `vehicles` WHERE `vehicles`.`id` = 1001 LIMIT 1
Started GET "/vendor_reps" for 127.0.0.1 at 2013-04-11 01:07:08 -0700
Completed 500 Internal Server Error in 4ms
NoMethodError (undefined method `serializable_hash' for #<ActiveModel::ArraySerializer:0x007fbbcaa82018>):
app/controllers/vehicles_controller.rb:20:in `block (2 levels) in show'
app/controllers/vehicles_controller.rb:18:in `show'
Processing by VendorRepsController#index as JSON
Parameters: {"vendor_rep"=>{}}
[1m[35mVendorRep Load (0.3ms)[0m SELECT `vendor_reps`.* FROM `vendor_reps`
Completed 200 OK in 2ms (Views: 0.3ms | ActiveRecord: 0.3ms)
Rendered /Users/pzuraq/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p385/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.2.11/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/rescues/_trace.erb (2.3ms)
Rendered /Users/pzuraq/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p385/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.2.11/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/rescues/_request_and_response.erb (1.0ms)
Rendered /Users/pzuraq/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p385/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/actionpack-3.2.11/lib/action_dispatch/middleware/templates/rescues/diagnostics.erb within rescues/layout (11.7ms)
The code is gisted here: https://gist.github.com/pzuraq/5361607 代码位于此处: https ://gist.github.com/pzuraq/5361607
So it turns out that using :option as a property name was causing conflicts. 因此事实证明,使用:option作为属性名称会引起冲突。 There are probably other conflicting names as well. 可能还有其他冲突的名称。 Gotta be careful about the namespace! 要注意名称空间!
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.