简体   繁体   English

返回变量与设置变量

[英]Returning variable vs. Setting variable

I'm considering the following approaches for class initialisation: 我正在考虑以下方法进行类初始化:

class Foo():
    def __init__(self):
        self.name = self.get_name()
    def get_name(self):
        return raw_input("Name: ")

class Foo():
    def __init__(self):
        self.name = ""
        self.get_name()
    def get_name(self):
        self.name = raw_input("Name: ")

class Foo():
    def __init__(self):
        self.name = raw_input("Name: ")

Is there any practical reason to opt for one over the others? 是否有任何实际理由选择其中一个?

If not, which might be considered most Pythonic? 如果没有,哪个可能被认为是大多数Pythonic?

  • If possible, input() the name outside of the class and pass it as a parameter to its __init__() . 如果可能,在类外部input()名称,并将其作为参数传递给__init__()
  • If this is not an option, I would go for the second alternative 如果这不是一个选项,我会选择第二种选择
  • I would rename get_name() to something like query_name() or input_name() . 我会将get_name()重命名为query_name()input_name() get_name() sounds like a getter (that gets the value of name ) not like a setter or a routine that gets data from the user . get_name()听起来像一个getter( 获取 name的值),而不像setter或从用户 那里获取数据的例程。

I don't like the idea of doing a raw input in the constructor, but after all, why not... I would prefer: 我不喜欢在构造函数中执行原始输入的想法,但毕竟,为什么不...我更喜欢:

class Foo():
    def __init__(self):
        self.name = ""

    def prompt_name(self):
        self.name = raw_input("Name: ")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    aFoo = Foo()
    aFoo.prompt_name()

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM