为什么Lo-Dash _.each比Boiler.js _.each和Underscore.js _.each快？
[英]Why is Lo-Dash _.each faster than Boiler.js _.each and Underscore.js _.each?
问题描述
Having not yet had the time to review the Lo-Dash code base (in great detail - work has me pretty strapped for time) I was wondering if someone could explain to me off the top of their head how Lo-Dash's _.each method out performs other libraries equivalents? 
还没有时间检查Lo-Dash代码库（非常详细-工作使我花了很多时间），我想知道是否有人可以向我解释一下Lo-Dash的_.each方法如何执行其他库的等效项？
1 个解决方案
解决方案1
2 2013-06-05 16:18:24
Google is your friend, young grasshopper: http://kitcambridge.be/blog/say-hello-to-lo-dash/ Google是您的朋友，年轻的蚱hopper： http ： //kitcambridge.be/blog/say-hello-to-lo-dash/
In summary: Lo-Dash avoids using browser-native methods in favor of simple loops, which oddly enough are faster in most cases. 总结：Lo-Dash避免使用浏览器本机方法来支持简单循环，这奇怪的是在大多数情况下速度更快。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.