简体   繁体   English

永远不要在PIMPL中提供析构函数(使用boost scoped_ptr),g ++(4.6.1)不会产生编译错误,为什么?

[英]Never provide destructor in the PIMPL(using boost scoped_ptr), the g++(4.6.1) doesn't generate compile error, Why?

After I read the reference link: Must provide destructor in the PIMPL , I do the follow the example, but the g++(4.6.1) doesn't generate compile error as I expected 在阅读参考链接之后: 必须在PIMPL中提供析构函数 ,我按照以下示例进行操作,但是g ++(4.6.1)不会产生预期的编译错误

The source code is: 源代码是:

// Predeclare.h
#include <vector>
#include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp>
#include <iostream>

struct A;

class Predeclare
{
    std::vector<A> alist_;
    boost::scoped_ptr<A> pa_;
    //A a;

public:
    Predeclare();
    //~Predeclare();

    void print();
    void set(int i);
};


// Predeclare.cpp
#include "Predeclare.h"

struct A
{
    int a;
};

Predeclare::Predeclare(): pa_(new A)
{}
/*
Predeclare::~Predeclare()
{}
*/

void Predeclare::print()
{
    std::cout << pa_->a << '\n';
}

void Predeclare::set(int i)
{
    pa_->a = i;
}

int main()
{
    Predeclare c1;
    c1.set(10);
    c1.print();

    return 0;
}

Then, compile the program 然后,编译程序

g++ Predeclare.cpp

Everything is ok, Why the g++(4.6.1) doesn't generate compile error? 一切正常,为什么g ++(4.6.1)不会产生编译错误?

In your example, the compiler only needs a destructor for Predeclare when it reaches the declaration of c1 in main() . 在您的示例中,编译器在main()到达c1 Predeclare时仅需要一个Predeclare的析构函数。 By that point, A has already been defined, earlier in Predeclare.cpp. 到那时,已经在Predeclare.cpp中定义了A

If you were to try to instantiate Predeclare in a different source file, you would likely run into problems. 如果要尝试在其他源文件中实例化Predeclare ,则可能会遇到问题。

Note that instantiating std::vector<A> where A is incomplete yields undefined behavior. 请注意,实例化std::vector<A>其中A不完整会产生未定义的行为。 When you instantiate a container, the value type must be Destructible, and only complete types are Destructible. 实例化容器时,值类型必须是可破坏的,而只有完整类型才是可破坏的。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM