简体   繁体   English

Monocross的现状 - 2013年7月

[英]The Current State Of Monocross - July 2013

I was looking for any info regarding the status the Monocross project ? 我在寻找有关Monocross项目状态的任何信息?

https://github.com/MonoCross/MonoCross https://github.com/MonoCross/MonoCross

I'm approaching a Beta release of a Monocross application that has been written to leverage the MVC pattern that the framework imposes. 我正在接近Monocross应用程序的Beta版本,该版本是为了利用框架所强加的MVC模式而编写的。

Now that I'm so heavily invested into this framework, I'm wondering what the projects current state is ? 既然我对这个框架投入了大量资金,我想知道当前状态是什么项目? Is it still actively supported and being used in current applications ? 它是否仍然得到积极支持并在当前应用程序中使用? Will it be supported in the forseeable future. 它是否会在可预见的未来得到支持。 Is MvvmCross a viable alternative ? MvvmCross是否可行?

Thank you. 谢谢。

I can provide a little bit of info on this. 我可以提供一些关于此的信息。 The original version of MonoCross was developed by Scott Olson and Kenny Goers of ITR Mobility in St. Paul, MN. MonoCross的原始版本由位于明尼苏达州圣保罗的ITR Mobility的Scott Olson和Kenny Goers开发。 It's a cool framework. 这是一个很酷的框架。 The first time another developer and I worked on an Android/iOS app side by side sharing ALL of our models and controllers and other non-view code, it blew my mind. 这是另一位开发人员和我一起在Android / iOS应用程序上共同工作,共享我们所有的模型和控制器以及其他非视图代码,这让我大吃一惊。 The only divergence in our code repository was our view code. 我们的代码库中唯一的分歧是我们的视图代码。 Amazeballs! Amazeballs!

So, as far as the curent state of MonoCross, I don't know how much more work has been done or is being done by those guys. 因此,就MonoCross的现状而言,我不知道这些家伙已经做了多少工作或者做了多少工作。 Until recently, I was working in the same office as them on a daily basis. 直到最近,我每天都和他们在同一个办公室工作。 The project was open-sourced from the get-go so that it could get picked up and run with. 该项目是从一开始就开源的,因此它可以被选中并运行。

From my own observations, it seems that Stuart Lodge's MvvmCross has experienced much more community momentum than MonoCross. 根据我自己的观察,Stuart Lodge的MvvmCross似乎比MonoCross经历了更多的社区动力。 I wouldn't expect as much commitment from the arbiters of MonoCross as I would expect from Lodge. 我不希望MonoCross仲裁者的承诺与我对Lodge的期望一样多。 Unless someone else comes along and throws themselves at MonoCross the way that Lodge has thrown himself at MvvmCross. 除非有其他人出现并将自己投入MonoCross,就像洛奇在MvvmCross上投掷自己一样。 Also, it seems that people into mobile dev are more fond of the two-way property-binding that the MVVM pattern provides, as opposed to the one-way model-passing navigational paradigm of MVC. 此外,似乎人们对移动开发者更喜欢MVVM模式提供的双向属性绑定,而不是MVC的单向模型传递导航范例。

As to whether or not someone IS throwing themselves at MonoCross, I really can't say. 至于某人是否在MonoCross投掷自己,我真的不敢说。 It would be worth reaching out to Kenny Goers or Scott Olson. 值得与Kenny Goers或Scott Olson联系。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM