[英]How do I delete a row with a null foreign key using Linq-to-SQL?
I have a table called tblOvrdImpVolsType
with two foreign key columns that are both nullable. 我有一个名为tblOvrdImpVolsType
的表, tblOvrdImpVolsType
包含两个可以为空的外键列。 I'm having trouble deleting a row in this table using Linq-To-SQL when one of the foreign key columns in this row is null. 当此行中的一个外键列为空时,我在使用Linq-To-SQL删除此表中的行时遇到问题。 Here's my code: 这是我的代码:
using (Databases.Global db = new Databases.Global())
{
db.Log = Console.Out;
var records = from iv in db.tblOvrdImpVolsType
join sm in db.tblSecurityMasterType
on iv.FkSecurity equals sm.PkSecurity
where sm.Name == name
select iv; //returns only 1 record
db.tblOvrdImpVolsType.DeleteAllOnSubmit<MyTableType>(records);
int numDeletes = db.GetChangeSet().Deletes.Count; // = 1
db.SubmitChanges(); //deletes 0 records
}
Databases.Global inherits from DataContext and has the tables that I use. Databases.Global继承自DataContext并具有我使用的表。
tblOvrdImpVolsType has two nullable, foreign key columns (key1 and key2) tblOvrdImpVolsType有两个可以为空的外键列(key1和key2)
the row I am interested has these key values (key1 = 9898, key2 = null) 我感兴趣的行有这些键值(key1 = 9898,key2 = null)
In my C# code, the datatypes of key1 and key2 are both int?
在我的C#代码中,key1和key2的数据类型都是int?
and CanBeNull = true
和CanBeNull = true
The GetChangeSet()
shows that one record will be deleted, but when I check the database, that row is clearly not deleted. GetChangeSet()
显示将删除一条记录,但是当我检查数据库时,该行显然不会被删除。
No exceptions are thrown. 没有异常被抛出。
Here is the SQL that the DataContext generates: 这是DataContext生成的SQL:
DELETE FROM [tblOvrdImpVols] WHERE ([key1] = @p0) AND ([key2] = @p1)
-- @p0: Input Int (Size = -1; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [9898]
-- @p1: Input Int (Size = -1; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [Null]
-- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2008) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 4.0.30319.17929
I think the problem is the [key2] = @p1
part. 我认为问题是[key2] = @p1
部分。 Because the key2 value I'm interested in is null, the SQL is bad. 因为我感兴趣的key2值为null,所以SQL很糟糕。 These SQL queries below illustrate this. 下面的这些SQL查询说明了这一点 The only difference is the is
vs. =
in the key2
condition: 唯一的区别是key2
条件中的is
vs. =
:
select * FROM [tblOvrdImpVols] WHERE ([key1] = 9898) AND ([key2] is null)
--returns 1 row
select * FROM [tblOvrdImpVols] WHERE ([key1] = 9898) AND ([key2] = null)
--returns 0 rows
What am I doing wrong? 我究竟做错了什么? I assume that if I can get the DataContext object to replace the =
with is
for null values, the deletes will work. 我认为,如果我能得到DataContext对象来代替=
同is
空值时,会删除工作。 I don't know how to do that. 我不知道该怎么做。 I also assume this question has been asked before, but I can't find it. 我还假设之前已经问过这个问题,但我找不到它。
EDIT: I originally called my keys "primary" rather than "foreign". 编辑:我最初称我的键为“主要”而不是“外国”。 I meant to say "foreign". 我打算说“外国人”。 I edited my post to say "foreign" instead. 我编辑我的帖子说“外国”。 I am still having the same problem. 我仍然遇到同样的问题。
To make sure that you also catch nulls, you could modify your query to look like this : 为了确保您还捕获空值,您可以将查询修改为如下所示:
select * FROM [tblOvrdImpVols]
WHERE ([key1] = @p0) AND
([key2] = @p1 OR
([key2] is null and @p1 is null) )
The main problem here - in SQL, nothing is equal to NULL. 这里的主要问题 - 在SQL中,没有任何东西等于NULL。 NULL is not equal even to itself! NULL甚至不等于它自己! "NULL = NULL" will evaluate to "false" in SQL query. 在SQL查询中,“NULL = NULL”将评估为“false”。 So, when you need to delete rows where [key2] == null, you need to write LINQ query which will produce SQL like 因此,当你需要删除[key2] == null的行时,你需要编写LINQ查询,它会产生类似SQL的
"WHERE [key2] = @p1 AND [key2] IS NULL" “WHERE [key2] = @ p1 AND [key2] IS NULL”
instead of 代替
"WHERE [key2] = @p1 AND [key2] = @p2". “WHERE [key2] = @ p1 AND [key2] = @ p2”。
How to do it? 怎么做? It seems the right way will be to compare [key2] with null. 似乎正确的方法是将[key2]与null进行比较。 For example, if you want to get all rows from tblSecurityMasterType where Name is NULL, this will be the wrong way: 例如,如果要从名称为NULL的tblSecurityMasterType获取所有行,则这将是错误的方式:
string NameNull = null;
from sm in db.tblSecurityMasterType
where sm.Name == NameNull
select sm;
You will need to use this query instead: 您将需要使用此查询:
from sm in db.tblSecurityMasterType
where sm.Name == null
select sm;
It's described here: http://smsohan.com/blog/2008/08/05/comparing-with-null-in-where-clause-in/ 它在这里描述: http : //smsohan.com/blog/2008/08/05/comparing-with-null-in-where-clause-in/
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.