没有数据库的Rails模型

Question

I want to create a Rails (2.1 and 2.2) model with ActiveRecord validations, but without a database table. What is the most widely used approach? I've found some plugins that claim to offer this functionality, but many of them don't appear to be widely used or maintained. What does the community recommend I do? Right now I am leaning toward coming up with my own solution based on this blog post .

Answer 1

在Rails 3中有更好的方法： http ： //railscasts.com/episodes/219-active-model

Answer 2

This is an approach I have used in the past:

In app/models/tableless.rb

class Tableless < ActiveRecord::Base
  def self.columns
    @columns ||= [];
  end

  def self.column(name, sql_type = nil, default = nil, null = true)
    columns << ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::Column.new(name.to_s, default,
      sql_type.to_s, null)
  end

  # Override the save method to prevent exceptions.
  def save(validate = true)
    validate ? valid? : true
  end
end

In app/models/foo.rb

class Foo < Tableless
  column :bar, :string  
  validates_presence_of :bar
end

In script/console

Loading development environment (Rails 2.2.2)
>> foo = Foo.new
=> #<Foo bar: nil>
>> foo.valid?
=> false
>> foo.errors
=> #<ActiveRecord::Errors:0x235b270 @errors={"bar"=>["can't be blank"]}, @base=#<Foo bar: nil>>

Answer 3

There is easier way now:

class Model
  include ActiveModel::Model

  attr_accessor :var

  validates :var, presence: true
end

ActiveModel::Model code:

module ActiveModel
  module Model
    def self.included(base)
      base.class_eval do
        extend  ActiveModel::Naming
        extend  ActiveModel::Translation
        include ActiveModel::Validations
        include ActiveModel::Conversion
      end
    end

    def initialize(params={})
      params.each do |attr, value|
        self.public_send("#{attr}=", value)
      end if params
    end

    def persisted?
      false
    end
  end
end

http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveModel/Model.html

Answer 4

just create a new file ending in ".rb" following the conventions you're used to (singular for file name and class name, underscored for file name, camel case for class name) on your "models/" directory. The key here is to not inherit your model from ActiveRecord (because it is AR that gives you the database functionality). eg: for a new model for cars, create a file called "car.rb" in your models/ directory and inside your model:

class Car
    # here goes all your model's stuff
end

edit: btw, if you want attributes on your class, you can use here everything you use on ruby, just add a couple lines using "attr_accessor":

class Car
    attr_accessor :wheels # this will create for you the reader and writer for this attribute
    attr_accessor :doors # ya, this will do the same

    # here goes all your model's stuff
end

edit #2: after reading Mike's comment, I'd tell you to go his way if you want all of the ActiveRecord's functionality but no table on the database. If you just want an ordinary Ruby class, maybe you'll find this solution better ;)

Answer 5

I think the blog post you are linking is the best way to go. I would only suggest moving the stubbed out methods into a module not to pollute your code.

Answer 6

For the sake of completeness:

Rails now (at V5) has a handy module you can include:

include ActiveModel::Model

This allows you to initialise with a hash, and use validations amongst other things.

Full documentation is here .

Answer 7

There's a screencast about non-Active Record model, made up by Ryan Bates. A good place to start from.

Just in case you did not already watch it.

Answer 8

I have built a quick Mixin to handle this, as per John Topley's suggestion.

http://github.com/willrjmarshall/Tableless

Answer 9

What about marking the class as abstract?

class Car < ActiveRecord::Base
  self.abstract = true
end

this will tell rails that the Car class has no corresponding table.

[edit]

this won't really help you if you'll need to do something like:

my_car = Car.new

Answer 10

Use the Validatable gem. As you say, there are AR-based solutions, but they tend to be brittle.

http://validatable.rubyforge.org/

Answer 11

Anybody has ever tried to include ActiveRecord::Validations and ActiveRecord::Validations::ClassMethods in a non-Active Record class and see what happens when trying to setup validators ?

I'm sure there are plenty of dependencies between the validation framework and ActiveRecord itself. But you may succeed in getting rid of those dependencies by forking your own validation framework from the AR validation framework.

Just an idea.

Update : oopps, this is more or less what's suggested in the post linked with your question. Sorry for the disturbance.

Answer 12

You ought to checkout the PassiveRecord plugin. It gives you an ActiveRecord-like interface for non-database models. It's simple, and less hassle than fighting ActiveRecord.

We're using PassiveRecord in combination with the Validatable gem to get the OP's desired behaviour.

Answer 13

Do like Tiago Pinto said and just don't have your model inherit from ActiveRecord::Base. It'll just be a regular Ruby class that you stick in a file in your app/models/ directory. If none of your models have tables and you're not using a database or ActiveRecord at all in your app, be sure to modify your environment.rb file to have the following line:

config.frameworks -= [:active_record]

This should be within the Rails::Initializer.run do |config| block.