[英]LINQ OrderBy().ThenBy() not working
I am converting a project of mine from using an SQL Server based Entity Framework model, to using a local SQLite database. 我正在将我的项目从使用基于SQL Server的实体框架模型转换为使用本地SQLite数据库。 So far everything is going well, but for some reason I am not able to sort queries on multiple columns.
到目前为止,一切进展顺利,但是由于某种原因,我无法对多列进行查询排序。 For example:
例如:
using (var db = new SQLiteConnection("test3.db"))
{
var query = from a in db.Table<Account>()
where a.Inactive == false
orderby a.AccountName, a.AccountNickname
select a;
foreach (var account in query)
{
accounts.Add(account);
}
}
AccountsGrid.ItemsSource = accounts;
Gives me the error Cannot resolve symbol 'ThenBy'
, but if I change the ordering to: 给我错误
Cannot resolve symbol 'ThenBy'
,但是如果我将顺序更改为:
orderby a.AccountName
then the query works fine. 然后查询工作正常。 I have also tried using
.OrderBy(a => a.AccountName).ThenBy(a => a.AccountNickname)
but I get the same error. 我也尝试过使用
.OrderBy(a => a.AccountName).ThenBy(a => a.AccountNickname)
但是我遇到了同样的错误。 I am already including using System.Linq;
我已经包括
using System.Linq;
but ReSharper is telling me that the using directive is not required, so that seems fishy also. 但是ReSharper告诉我,using指令不是必需的,所以这似乎也很麻烦。 Does anyone have any ideas what I could be missing?
有谁知道我可能会缺少什么?
Looking at the source , it seems the author doesn't understand LINQ properly: 从源头上看,作者似乎不太了解LINQ:
ThenBy
method, but instead they're collecting multiple orderings with multiple OrderBy
calls ThenBy
方法,而是通过多个OrderBy
调用来收集多个订单 IQueryable<T>
implementation (which is why you don't need using System.Linq
) - while this is a valid approach, it's a pretty unusual one IQueryable<T>
实现(这就是为什么您不需要using System.Linq
)-尽管这是一种有效的方法,但这是一种非常不寻常的方法 I would personally be pretty nervous about using this - the fact that it's "organized" as three huge source files is slightly alarming too. 我个人会对使用它感到非常紧张-它被“组织”为三个巨大的源文件这一事实也有点令人震惊。 You may want to try using LinqConnect instead - although I haven't used that, either.
您可能想改用LinqConnect-尽管我也没有用过。
If you do want to stick with the implementation you're using, I suspect that this would work - but it wouldn't work with other LINQ providers: 如果您确实想坚持使用所使用的实现,我怀疑这会起作用-但不适用于其他LINQ提供程序:
var query = from a in db.Table<Account>()
where a.Inactive == false
orderby a.AccountName
orderby a.AccountNickname // Warning! Not portable!
select a;
Normally having two orderby
calls like this would be a really, really bad idea - but it seems that that's what the LINQ provider wants in this case. 通常,这样进行两次
orderby
调用是一个非常非常糟糕的主意 -但在这种情况下,这似乎是LINQ提供程序想要的。
In Linq Query
var query = (from a in db.Table<Account>()
where a.Inactive == false
orderby a.AccountName ascending, a.AccountNickname descending
select m);
In Lambda Expression
var query = db.Table<Account>().where(a => a.Inactive == false).OrderBy(a => a.AccountName).ThenByDescending(a =>a.AccountNickname);
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.