[英]SQL Dependency vs Change Data Capture (CDC)
I am using CDC for database change notification. 我正在使用CDC进行数据库更改通知。
But some suggested to not use CDC. 但是有些建议不要使用CDC。
I found this other option SQL Dependency. 我找到了另一个选项SQL Dependency。
Which one is better option among SQL Dependency and CDC? 在SQL依赖关系和CDC中哪个更好的选择?
Without having read extensively on the two and their differences, one thing that jumps out immediately is the fact that CDC is only available on SQL Server Enterprise. 在没有广泛阅读两者及其区别的情况下,立即跳出的一件事是CDC仅在SQL Server Enterprise上可用。 It also looks like CDC would use significant storage space and incurs a performance hit but SqlDependency is only recommended for a small number of dependent clients.
看起来CDC会占用大量存储空间并会导致性能下降,但是仅建议将SqlDependency用于少量的依赖客户端。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.