[英]eclipse auto getter and setter method in other method
This is simple class implementation 这是简单的类实现
class A{
private int a;
public void doSomething() {
a = 5;
int b = a;
/*.
.
. */
}
/*
.
.
. */
}
now i'm using eclipse CTRL + 1 quick fix keybind and insert get and set mothod and codes will be this and this is option 1 现在我正在使用eclipse CTRL + 1快速修复keybind并插入get和set mothod和代码将是这个,这是选项1
class A{
private int a;
public void doSomething() {
setA(5);
int b = getA();
/*.
.
. */
}
/*
.
.
. */
public int getA() {
return a;
}
public void setA(int a) {
this.a = a;
}
}
but if i want keep field codes will be this.(option 2) 但如果我想保持字段代码将是这个。(选项2)
class A{
private int a;
public void doSomething() {
a = 5;
int b = a;;
/*.
.
. */
}
/*
.
.
. */
public int getA() {
return a;
}
public void setA(int a) {
this.a = a;
}
}
so which option is better for oop or code organization. 那么哪个选项更适合oop或代码组织。
If you want to keep the normal assignment of a
(ie a = 5;
) inside doSomething
instead of using the setter ( setA(5)
), try creating the getters and setters using the refactoring key binding Alt + Shift + s and then select "Generate Getters and Setters". 如果你想在
doSomething
保持a
(即a = 5;
)的正常分配而不是使用setter( setA(5)
),尝试使用重构键绑定Alt + Shift + s创建getter和setter,然后选择“生成吸气剂和二传手”。
If the only thing the setter does is assign the value to the field, there should be no difference between the two options. 如果setter做的唯一事情是将值赋给字段,那么两个选项之间应该没有区别。
If I understand you, then you could make int setA(int)
also return a;
如果我理解你,那么你可以使
int setA(int)
也return a;
, and then you can "chain" the method calls ,然后你可以“链接”方法调用
public int setA(int a) {
this.a = a;
return a;
}
public void doSomething() {
int b = setA(5);
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.