[英]EF 6 Code First one column is not created
I am using EF 6 Code First, I don't understand why one column is not created for a property of my Model. 我正在使用EF 6代码首先,我不明白为什么没有为我的模型的属性创建一列。
Here is the first class : 这是头等舱:
public class Original
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public string Nom { get; private set; }
public Historique Historique { get; private set; }
public Traduction Traduction { get; private set; }
}
And here is the second class : 这是第二堂课:
public class Traduction
{
public int ID { get; set; }
public Utilisateur Traducteur { get; private set; }
public Original Original { get; private set; }
public string Content { get; private set; }
}
EF doesn't create the FK column for Traduction and Original. EF不会为Traduction和Original创建FK列。 (The Traduction table doesn't contains a FK column for Original and vice versa) but it perfectly creates all the other column and FKs.
(“转导”表不包含“原始”的FK列,反之亦然),但它可以完美地创建所有其他列和FK。
I am playing with Fluent API to set up the relationships. 我正在使用Fluent API来建立关系。 I have tried both to rely on the automatic conventions, and to explicitly configure the relation with :
我试图既依赖于自动约定,又明确地使用以下方式配置关系:
modelBuilder.Entity<Original>().HasRequired(o => o.Traduction).WithRequiredPrincipal(t=>t.Original).WillCascadeOnDelete(true);
But the columns are still not created. 但是仍然没有创建列。
Thank you for your help 谢谢您的帮助
Update 更新
I don't know if it is useful but I would like to add one information, my Dbset are defined like this in the context class : 我不知道它是否有用,但我想添加一个信息,我的Dbset在上下文类中是这样定义的:
public DbSet<Traduction> Traductions { get; set; }
public DbSet<Original> Originaux { get; set; }
"Originaux" if the French plural for "Originals". “ Originaux”如果将法语复数表示为“ Originals”。 However I have noticed that the Table created by EF is Named "Originals", and doesn't follow the name of the DbSet.
但是我注意到EF创建的表被命名为“ Originals”,并且没有遵循DbSet的名称。 I don't know, perhaps it might be a cause of the problem.
我不知道,也许这可能是问题的原因。
As Dismissile said, EF doesn't create an extra column to hold the foreign keys because it is a one-to-one relationship. 正如Dismissile所说,EF不会创建额外的列来容纳外键,因为它是一对一的关系。 This is a normal behaviour and nothing is actually wrong.
这是正常现象,实际上没有错。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.