[英]C++: overloading “pointer to object” * operator
I was some misunderstanding about default operator definition(by compiler). 我对默认的运算符定义(由编译器)有些误解。
I have small class: 我有一堂课:
class Q
{
public:
Q() {};
Q(int i) { x = i; };
~Q() {};
void print() { cout << x << endl; };
Q& operator * ()
{
cout << "operator *\n";
return *this;
};
const Q& operator * () const
{
cout << "operator *\n";
return *this;
};
private:
int x;
};
And i'm doing this whit it: 我正在做这件事:
int main()
{
Q* obj_p = new Q(1);
Q obj = *obj_p;
obj.print();
return 0;
}
I expected to see operator *
, before 1
. 我期望在
1
之前看到operator *
。 But I saw only print()
method result. 但是我只看到
print()
方法的结果。
What does it mean? 这是什么意思? That I don't need to overload
operator *
- it's compiler work or that I do overloading somehow wrong? 我不需要重载
operator *
-它是编译器的工作,还是我确实以某种方式重载了?
Thanks. 谢谢。
obj_p
is a pointer. obj_p
是一个指针。 You have not overloaded (and cannot do it anyway) the de-reference operator for a pointer. 您尚未使指针的取消引用运算符超载(也无法做到)。 To invoke your overload, you need to act on an instance:
要调用重载,您需要对一个实例进行操作:
Q obj;
*obj;
There's no user-defined operator called - obj_p
is a pointer, not an object, so the built-in dereference operator is called. 没有用户定义的运算符
obj_p
是指针,而不是对象,因此调用了内置的取消引用运算符。
To complete juanchopanza's answer, you can call your operator on a pointer like so: 要完成juanchopanza的答案,您可以像这样调用指针上的运算符:
Q* obj_p = new Q(1);
Q obj = obj_p->operator*();
You use your '*' operator on Q pointer but you should use on Q objects. 您在Q指针上使用了'*'运算符,但应该在Q对象上使用。 if you try *(*obj_p) you will see.
如果尝试*(* obj_p),将会看到。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.