[英]Define collection in entity framework without creating relationship
I have two classes Song
and Album
. 我有两个班
Song
和Album
。 Album
has nested collection of songs. Album
有嵌套的歌曲集。 But in EF I have to create relationships between. 但是在EF中,我必须在两者之间建立关系。 But
Song
can be single or without Album
. 但是
Song
可以是单曲,也可以没有Album
。 So I want create something like that in database. 所以我想在数据库中创建类似的东西。
public class Song:IEntity
{
public Song()
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
}
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Artist { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
} }
public class Album:IEntity
{
public Album()
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
}
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Artist { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public DateTime Year { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<Song> Songs { get; set; }
}
Ok, and what is not working? 好的,什么不起作用? Your model looks fine besides depriving yourself from ability to check if Song is part of any album or not.
除了使自己无法检查Song是否属于任何专辑之外,您的模型看起来还不错。
Many-Many nad 1-Many relationships are translated into seperate tables, until you add relationship between certain instances you don't lose any memory. 多对多1对多关系将转换为单独的表,直到您在某些实例之间添加关系为止,您才不会丢失任何内存。 Is there any reason why not to add:
public Album Album {get;set;}
to the Album
, there is something like null
you know? 是否有任何理由不添加:
public Album Album {get;set;}
到Album
,您知道类似null
内容吗?
Update your Song
class to: 将您的
Song
类更新为:
public class Song:IEntity
{
public Song()
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid().ToString();
}
public virtual Album Album { get; set; }. //add this line
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Artist { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
}
And define following mapping in your DbContext
: 并在
DbContext
定义以下映射:
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<Song>()
.HasOptional(c => c.Album)
.WithMany(t => t.Songs);
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.