[英]Cannot construct an std::map with a customer compare functor?
#include <map>
using namespace std;
class C {
public:
C(map<int,int> m) { }
int operator()(int a, int b) {
return a < b;
}
};
int main() {
map<int, int> m;
map<int, int, C> mymap(C(m));
mymap.insert(pair<int,int>(1,1));
}
Why do I get the following error?: 为什么会出现以下错误?
main.cpp: In function 'int main()':
main.cpp:16:11: error: request for member 'insert' in 'mymap', which is of non-class type 'std::map<int, int, C>(C)'
mymap.insert(pair<int,int>(1,1));
Here is the coliru link: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/0413a35d3177ef48 这是coliru链接: http ://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/0413a35d3177ef48
This is an example of a vexing parse - function declaration, where you'd expect an object. 这是令人烦恼的解析-函数声明的示例,在该函数中您期望有一个对象。
Try this: 尝试这个:
map<int, int, C> mymap((C(m)));
map<int, int, C> mymap(C(m));
In this mymap is taken as a function. 在此,将mymap作为函数。 Change it to
更改为
map<int, int, C> mymap((C(m)));
In C++11 you can also avoid vexing parse by using brace initializer: 在C ++ 11中,您还可以通过使用括号初始化程序避免繁琐的解析:
map<int, int, C> mymap(C{m});
(Though if would behave differently if C
had a constructor C(std::initializer_list<T>)
where map<int, int>
would be implicitly convertible to T
, so that constructor would be called instead) (尽管如果
C
具有构造函数C(std::initializer_list<T>)
,如果行为会有所不同,其中map<int, int>
将隐式转换为T
,那么将改为调用构造函数)
Update: as Benjamin Bannier pointed out, you can use brace initializers everywhere: 更新:正如本杰明·班尼尔(Benjamin Bannier)所指出的,您可以在任何地方使用括号初始化器:
map<int, int, C> mymap{C{m}};
or 要么
map<int, int, C> mymap{C(m)};
With the same precaution: C
shouldn't have operator std::pair<const int, int>()
. 使用相同的预防措施:
C
不应具有operator std::pair<const int, int>()
。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.