简体   繁体   English

如果EXPLAIN只显示400行,为什么MySQL SELECT查询需要1-2分钟才能运行?

[英]Why would a MySQL SELECT query take 1-2 minutes to run if EXPLAIN only shows 400 rows?

I need to fetch the most recent 1000 records from a large table (70M rows) matching a couple well-indexed items through INNER JOINs on two simple and small tables. 我需要从一个大表(70M行)中获取最近的1000条记录,通过两个简单和小表上的INNER JOIN匹配几个索引良好的项目。

The query is taking 1-2 minutes to run. 查询需要1-2分钟才能运行。 Yet the explain only shows several hundred rows to look through. 然而, explain只显示了几百行。 What gives? 是什么赋予了?

How can I optimize the query or more efficiently index the tables to make this query run in the milliseconds I expect? 如何优化查询或更有效地索引表以使此查询以我期望的毫秒运行?

The Tables: 表格:

score    70,000,000 records
class           400 records
category        400 records

The query: 查询:

SELECT
    s.log_id,
    s.category_id
FROM
    score s
    INNER JOIN category ca ON s.category_id = ca.id
    INNER JOIN class cl ON ca.class_id = cl.id
WHERE
        s.score_status_type_id = 0
    AND ca.category_status_id = 1
    AND cl.class_status_id IN (1, 2)
    AND s.date > DATE_ADD(NOW(), INTERVAL -1440 minute)
GROUP BY s.log_id
ORDER BY s.date DESC
LIMIT 1000:

Here's the explain: 这是解释:

*** row 1 ***
          table:  cl
           type:  range
  possible_keys:  PRIMARY,class_status_id
            key:  class_status_id
        key_len:  4
            ref:  NULL
           rows:  36
          Extra:  Using where; Using index; Using temporary; Using filesort
*** row 2 ***
          table:  ca
           type:  ref
  possible_keys:  PRIMARY,class_id,category_status_id,category_status_id_class_id_id
            key:  category_status_id_class_id_id
        key_len:  8
            ref:  const,my_db.cl.id
           rows:  1
          Extra:  Using index
*** row 3 ***
          table:  s
           type:  ref
  possible_keys:  unique_key,category_id,date,score,score_status_type_id,score_status_and_date,category_id_score_status_type_id_date_log_id,date_reverse,category_id_date_reverse,score_date
            key:  category_id_score_status_type_id_date_log_id
        key_len:  8
            ref:  my_db.ca.id,const
           rows:  396
          Extra:  Using where; Using index

Here are some of the create tables: 以下是一些创建表:

CREATE TABLE `score` (
  `log_id` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
  `profile_id` bigint(20) DEFAULT NULL,
  `date` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  `class_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `score` float(10,6) DEFAULT NULL,
  `score_date` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  `process_date` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  `status_type_id` int(3) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `date_reverse` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  UNIQUE KEY `unique_key` (`log_id`,`class_id`),
  KEY `class_id` (`class_id`),
  KEY `profile_id` (`profile_id`),
  KEY `date` (`date`),
  KEY `score` (`score`),
  KEY `status_type_id` (`status_type_id `),
  KEY `status_type_id_date` (`status_type_id`,`date`),
  KEY `class_status_type_id_date_log_id` (`class_id`,`status_type_id`,`date`,`log_id`),
  KEY `date_reverse` (`date_reverse`),
  KEY `class_id_date_reverse` (`class_id`,`date_reverse`),
  KEY `date` (`date`),
  KEY `class_id_date_reverse_log_id` (`class_id`,`date_reverse`,`log_id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci;

CREATE TABLE `category` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `class_id` int(11) NOT NULL,
  `category_status_id` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '0',
  `name` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `class_id` (`class_id`),
  KEY `name` (`name`),
  KEY `category_status_id_class_id_id` (`category_status_id`,`class_id`,`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=412 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci

CREATE TABLE `class` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `class_status_id` int(11) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1',
  `name` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `person_id` (`person_id`),
  KEY `name` (`name`),
  KEY `class_status_id` (`class_status_id`),
  KEY `class_multi_1` (`class_status_id`,`name`,`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=407 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci

The problem is that the where clause is a filter that is applied after the joins are made, so your joined-table conditions being in the where clause require that the join actually be made and put into the temporary result set (which could be huge). 问题是where子句是在创建连接之后应用的过滤器 ,因此在where子句中的连接表条件要求实际连接并将其放入临时结果集(可能很大) 。 Usually the optimizer recognises that the condition can be asserted at join time, but sometimes it can be a bit dense, so... 通常,优化器会识别条件可以在连接时断言,但有时它可能有点密集,所以......

Try moving the non-key conditions into the joins 尝试将非键条件移动到连接中

SELECT s.log_id, s.category_id
FROM score s
JOIN category ca ON s.category_id = ca.id
    AND ca.category_status_id = 1
JOIN class cl ON ca.class_id = cl.id
    AND cl.class_status_id IN (1, 2)
WHERE s.score_status_type_id = 0
AND s.date > DATE_ADD(NOW(), INTERVAL -1440 minute)
GROUP BY s.log_id
ORDER BY s.date DESC
LIMIT 1000

If that doesn't help enough, try first grabbing the subset of score rows as a subquery, then doing your joins to that. 如果没有足够的帮助, 首先尝试抓住的子score行作为一个子查询, 然后做你的加入到这一点。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM