简体   繁体   English

使用泛型将super()调用到父类

[英]Calling super() to parent class using generics

I have several classes that all extend the same abstract class Encoder . 我有几个类都扩展了相同的abstract class Encoder The abstract class requires its children to override an abstract method which accepts a generic-typed parameter ( Subscriber<T> in this example). 抽象类要求其子级覆盖接受泛型类型参数的抽象方法(在此示例中为Subscriber<T> )。 Each subclass overriding this method uses a different type for this parameter. 覆盖此方法的每个子类对此参数使用不同的类型。

abstract class Encoder<T> {

  protected String mSomeArg;

  public Encoder(String someArg) {
    mSomeArg = someArg+" super";
  }

  public abstract void start(Subscriber<T> subscriber);
}


class ExampleEncoder extends Encoder {

  public ExampleEncoder(String arg) {
    super(arg); // how to make super class get generic type?
    // eg: new Encoder<Message>(arg)
  }

  @Override
  public void start(Subscriber<Message> subscriber) {
    Message msg = new Message("hi "+mSomeArg);
    subscriber.event(msg);
  }

}

Sample use case: 示例用例:

Encoder sample = new ExampleEncoder();
sample.start(new Subscriber<Message>() {
  @Override
  public void event(Message msg) {
    Log(msg.text());
  }
});

Encoder otherSample = new OtherEncoder();
sample.start(new Subscriber<OtherThing>() {
  @Override
  public void event(OtherThing thing) {
    Log(thing.toString());
  }
});

Question: How can each subclass call its super() with the generic type it requires for this abstract method? 问题:每个子类如何使用此抽象方法所需的泛型类型调用其super()

Note: Using Subscriber<?> in this abstract method for this example would defeat my purpose of using generics. 注意:对于此示例,在此抽象方法中使用Subscriber<?>会破坏我使用泛型的目的。 Also, instantiating each subclass with the generic type it requires (eg: new ExampleEncoder<Message>() ) seems like a plausible workaround, but also seems unnecessary 此外,使用它所需的泛型类型实例化每个子类(例如: new ExampleEncoder<Message>() )似乎是一个看似合理的解决方法,但似乎也没有必要

This 这个

class ExampleEncoder extends Encoder {

is a raw-type . 原型的 I'm fairly sure you wanted something like 我很确定你想要的东西

class ExampleEncoder extends Encoder<Message> {

if you want the concrete class to also be generic then you could use 如果你想要具体类也是通用的那么你可以使用

class ExampleEncoder<T> extends Encoder<T>

but you'd need to modify start to take a Subscriber<T> . 但是您需要修改start以获取Subscriber<T>

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM