简体   繁体   English

const &&的C ++ 11绑定规则

[英]C++11 binding rules for const &&

Many people do not know that const rvalue references are part of the C++11 language. 许多人不知道const rvalue引用是C ++ 11语言的一部分。 This blog post discusses them but appears to be mistaken regarding the binding rules. 这篇博客文章讨论了它们,但似乎在绑定规则上有误。 Quoting the blog: 引用博客:

struct s {};

void f (      s&);  // #1
void f (const s&);  // #2
void f (      s&&); // #3
void f (const s&&); // #4

const s g ();
s x;
const s cx;

f (s ()); // rvalue        #3, #4, #2
f (g ()); // const rvalue  #4, #2
f (x);    // lvalue        #1, #2
f (cx);   // const lvalue  #2

Note the asymmetry: while a const lvalue reference can bind to an rvalue, a const rvalue reference cannot bind to an lvalue. 注意不对称性:当const左值引用可以绑定到右值时,const右值引用不能绑定到左值。 In particular, this makes a const lvalue reference able to do everything a const rvalue reference can and more (ie, bind to lvalues). 特别是,这使得const左值引用能够执行const rvalue引用可以做的更多事情(即绑定到左值)。

The comments on the sample code appear to check out on my installation of GCC 4.9 (with -std=c++14 flag set). 示例代码的注释似乎在我安装GCC 4.9时检查(设置了-std = c ++ 14标志)。 So, contrary to the blog text, is it true that const && should bind to const & and const && and const & only bind to const & ? 因此,与博客文本相反, const &&应该绑定到const &const &&const &只绑定到const & If not what is the actual rule? 如果不是实际规则是什么?


Here is a demo that appears to show const && binding to const& in GCC 4.9: http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/794bbb911d00596e 这是一个演示,显示const &&绑定到const& in GCC 4.9: http//coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/794bbb911d00596e

'binding' in this context means tying a reference to a particular object. 在此上下文中,“绑定”意味着绑定对特定对象的引用。

int a;

int &b = a; // the reference is 'bound' to the object 'a'

void foo(int &c);

foo(a); // the reference parameter is bound to the object 'a'
        // for this particular execution of foo.

http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/5e081b59b5e76e03 http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/5e081b59b5e76e03

So then reading the quote: 那么阅读报价:

Note the asymmetry: while a const lvalue reference can bind to an rvalue, 注意不对称性:虽然const左值引用可以绑定到右值,

void foo(int const &);

foo(1); // the const lvalue reference parameter is bound to
        // the rvalue resulting from the expression '1'

http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/12722f2b38c74c75 http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/12722f2b38c74c75

a const rvalue reference cannot bind to an lvalue. const rvalue引用不能绑定到左值。

void foo(int const &&);

int a;

foo(a); // error, the expression 'a' is an lvalue; rvalue
        //references cannot bind to lvalues

http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/ccadc5307135c8e8 http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/ccadc5307135c8e8

In particular, this makes a const lvalue reference able to do everything a const rvalue reference can and more (ie, bind to lvalues). 特别是,这使得const左值引用能够执行const rvalue引用可以做的更多事情(即绑定到左值)。

void foo(int const &);

foo(1); // const lvalue reference can bind to rvalue

int a;
foo(a); // and lvalue

http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/d5553c99e182c89b http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/d5553c99e182c89b

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM