简体   繁体   English

Linq to SQL nullable int?

[英]Linq to SQL nullable int?

I have the following linq query (pretty simple): 我有以下linq查询(非常简单):

var jobs = from j in db.jobmsts
    join jd in db.jobdtls on j.jobdtl_id equals jd.jobdtl_id
    where j.jobmst_type != 1 && j.jobmst_prntid.Equals(folder.FolderID)
    orderby j.jobmst_name
    select new
        {
            JobID = j.jobmst_id,
            JobName = j.jobmst_name,
            Description = j.jobmst_desc,
            Source = jd.Source
        };

folder.FolderID is a nullable int (int?) that is passed into the method as a parameter. folder.FolderID是一个可以为null的int(int?),它作为参数传递给方法。 So, when it's null, the query returns no results. 因此,当它为null时,查询不返回任何结果。 But if I execute the same query in TSQL: 但是如果我在TSQL中执行相同的查询:

select * from jobmst j 
join jobdtl jd on j.jobdtl_id = jd.jobdtl_id 
where j.jobmst_type != 1 and j.jobmst_prntid is null

I get 6 records. 我得到6条记录。 Oddly, if I substitute "folder.FolderID" with "null" (in the linq code), it does return 6 records. 奇怪的是,如果我用“null”(在linq代码中)替换“folder.FolderID”,它确实会返回6条记录。 So, obviously there's a difference between "null" and an object with a null value. 所以,显然“null”和具有null值的对象之间存在差异。 I just don't know what is it and how to fix this. 我只是不知道它是什么以及如何解决这个问题。

FYI, I had the code so that the where clause looked like this: 仅供参考,我有代码,以便where子句看起来像这样:

where j.jobmst_type != 1 && j.jobmst_prntid == folder.FolderID

But it didn't produce any results either. 但它也没有产生任何结果。

Any help would be appreciated. 任何帮助,将不胜感激。

As I already mentioned it in a comment: Compare nullable types in Linq to Sql 正如我在评论中已经提到的那样: 将Linq中的可空类型与Sql进行比较

The answer to that question also applies here: Linq to SQL behaves kind of strangely when querying nullable types. 这个问题的答案也适用于此:Linq to SQL在查询可空类型时表现得有些奇怪。 The solution is to check for null explicitly if the value of the nullable type is null . 如果可空类型的值为null则解决方案是显式检查null If you don't want to write two queries, just write different where clauses (you have to mix in some lambda syntax): 如果您不想编写两个查询,只需编写不同的where子句(您必须混合使用一些lambda语法):

Expression<Func<Job,bool>> predicate;
if(folder.FolderID == null) {
    predicate = j=>j.jobmst_prntid == null && j.jobmst_type != 1;
} else {
    predicate = j=>j.jobmst_prntid == folder.FolderID && j.jobmst_type != 1;
}

//...
.Where(predicate)
select new
{
    // ...
}

I think you have to prepend (int ?) in the expression to work when you have null 我认为你必须在表达式中添加(int ?)才能使用null

j.jobmst_prntid.Equals ( folder.FolderID )
j.jobmst_prntid.Equals ( (int ? ) folder.FolderID )

For more reference: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb882535.aspx 有关更多参考: https//msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb882535.aspx

or you can try this 或者你可以试试这个

 where j.jobmst_type != 1 && j.jobmst_prntid.Equals(folder.FolderID== null ?   null : folder.FolderID)

I ended up doing this for my situation: 我最终为我的情况这样做了:

List<Job> folderJobs = new List<Job>();
var tidalJobs = (dynamic) null;
if (folder.FolderID == 0)
{
    tidalJobs = from 
                    master in tidal.jobmsts
                join
                    detail in tidal.jobdtls
                on
                    master.jobdtl_id equals detail.jobdtl_id
                where 
                    master.jobmst_prntid.HasValue == false && master.jobmst_type != 1
                select new
                {
                    JobID = master.jobmst_id,
                    JobName = master.jobmst_name,
                    Description = master.jobmst_desc == null ? string.Empty : master.jobmst_desc,
                    Source = detail.jobdtl_cmd == null ? string.Empty : detail.jobdtl_cmd
                };
}
else
{
    tidalJobs = from
                    master in tidal.jobmsts
                join
                    detail in tidal.jobdtls
                on
                    master.jobdtl_id equals detail.jobdtl_id
                where 
                    master.jobmst_prntid == folder.FolderID && master.jobmst_type != 1
                select new
                {
                    JobID = master.jobmst_id,
                    JobName = master.jobmst_name,
                    Description = master.jobmst_desc == null ? string.Empty : master.jobmst_desc,
                    Source = detail.jobdtl_cmd == null ? string.Empty : detail.jobdtl_cmd
                };
}

foreach (var folderJob in tidalJobs)
{
    ...
}

In short, var tidalJobs = (dynamic) null and .HasValue == false is what I needed to get this working. 简而言之,var tidalJobs =(dynamic)null和.HasValue == false是我需要的工作。 The only caveat is that setting a var to (dynamic) null disables intellisense b/c everything is evaluated at runtime. 唯一需要注意的是,将var设置为(dynamic)null会禁用intellisense b / c,所有内容都会在运行时进行评估。 So, your typing better be spot on. 所以,你的打字更好。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM