简体   繁体   English

Amazon S3 Glacier存储与直接使用Amazon Glacier服务是否相同?

[英]Is Amazon S3 Glacier Storage the same as using the Amazon Glacier Service Directly?

My doubt is the title of my question: 我的疑问是我的问题的标题:

I'm studying AWS, and I'm not understanding if when we use the S3 Glacier Storage, are we then using the Amazon Glacier Service or is the Glacier Storage Service just a property of Amazon S3? 我正在研究AWS,但是我不了解我们在使用S3 Glacier Storage时是在使用Amazon Glacier Service还是Glacier Storage Service只是Amazon S3的财产?

Yes. 是。

Data from an S3 bucket can copy data into Glacier archive storage. 来自S3存储桶的数据可以将数据复制到Glacier存档存储中。 This is exactly the same as using a Glacier storage archive directly behind the scenes. 这与在幕后直接使用Glacier存储档案完全相同。

When using the lifecycle properties of an S3 bucket and creating an archive, you are using both services together. 使用S3存储桶的生命周期属性并创建档案时,您将同时使用这两种服务。 They have different use-cases, speed & access capabilities, and pricing. 它们具有不同的用例,速度和访问功能以及定价。 They work together very seamlessly, but are in fact separate services. 它们非常无缝地协同工作,但实际上是单独的服务。

You can take a look at the Amazon S3 FAQ's Amazon Glacier section to get some additional info. 您可以查看Amazon S3常见问题解答的Amazon Glacier部分,以获取其他信息。

With that being said: be aware that if you archive FROM S3 to Glacier then you'll be using only the S3 APIs to access the Glacier archive. 话虽这么说:请注意,如果将FROM从 S3存档到Glacier,则将仅使用S3 API来访问Glacier存档。 They are still in fact different services, but when you perform an archive operation from an S3 bucket it creates a mapping for you. 实际上,它们仍然是不同的服务,但是当您从S3存储桶执行归档操作时,它将为您创建一个映射。 However, if you create an archive directly in Glacier bypassing S3, then you can use the separate Glacier API. 但是,如果绕过S3直接在Glacier中创建档案,则可以使用单独的Glacier API。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM