[英]How to Store HashMap<Integer,ArrayList<String>> to SQLite?
I have to store the HashMap value on SQLite with Keyset and reuse when application is restart using shared preference. 我必须使用Keyset将HashMap值存储在SQLite上,并在使用共享首选项重新启动应用程序时重用。
HashMap<Integer, ArrayList<String>> hashMap;
hashMap = new HashMap<>();
//Insert Value
hashMap.put(btn.getId(), listValue);
// Read a Value
Map.Entry<Integer, ArrayList<String>> entry = (Map.Entry<Integer, ArrayList<String>>) iteratorMap.next();
for (Integer ihashId :hashMap.keySet()) {
if( btnid == ihashId)
{
Set<Map.Entry<Integer, ArrayList<String>>> setMap = hashMap.entrySet();
Iterator<Map.Entry<Integer, ArrayList<String>>> iteratorMap = setMap.iterator();
while (iteratorMap.hasNext()) {
Map.Entry<Integer, ArrayList<String>> entry = (Map.Entry<Integer, ArrayList<String>>) iteratorMap.next();
ArrayList<String> values = entry.getValue();
if (btnId == entry.getKey()) {
getSetName.setText(values.get(0));
getSetAddress.setText(values.get(1));
getSetPin.setText(values.get(2));
getSetValue.setText(values.get(3));
}
}
}
Original Answer Before Question Edited: 问题编辑前的原始答案:
HashMap is already serialized so you can store the HashMap directly on your sqlite database as a BLOB. HashMap已经序列化,因此您可以将HashMap作为BLOB直接存储在sqlite数据库中。 Although you won't be able to read it's content until you de-serialize it.
虽然在对其进行反序列化之前,您将无法阅读其内容。
EDIT: 编辑:
You should put long running operations inside an async task. 您应该将长时间运行的操作放在异步任务中。 If you want the the reference to your variables to survive configuration changes, you should use a fragment and use
setRetainInstance(true)
although regardless of keeping your reference to the AsyncTask, it is independent of the UI thread and will keep running. 如果您希望对变量的引用在配置更改后继续存在,则应使用片段并使用
setRetainInstance(true)
但无论是否保留对AsyncTask的引用,它都独立于UI线程并将继续运行。
SIDE NOTE: 边注:
Always use manually counted loop when using ArrayList as it has better performance. 使用ArrayList时始终使用手动计数循环,因为它具有更好的性能。
As seen in this comparison , using for loop with counter set to the size of the array is significantly faster than for each loop: 如此比较所示 ,使用具有设置为数组大小的计数器的for循环比每个循环快得多:
private static List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>();
for(int j = list.size(); j > size ; j--)
{
//do stuff
}
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.