简体   繁体   English

dcevm Java中的热交换与JRebel / LiveRebel稳定性

[英]dcevm true Hot Swap in Java vs JRebel/LiveRebel stability

I just installed DCEVM on my dev machine with hotswap agent and it seems to work well. 我刚安装 DCEVM我的开发机器上热插拔剂 ,它似乎运作良好。 DCEVM looks like an alternative to JRebel/LiveRebel. DCEVM看起来像是JRebel / LiveRebel的替代品。 Also on production systems. 也在生产系统上。

Is DCEVM and hotswap agent production ready? DCEVM和hotswap代理生产准备好了吗?

What are the production-problematic issues? 什么是生产问题?

Both DCEVM and JRebel are meant for development environments only. DCEVM和JRebel都仅适用于开发环境。

DCEVM works fine in many use cases, it can load most of the class changes and is perfect if you are on budget and need basic reload capability. DCEVM在许多用例中都能正常工作,它可以加载大多数类更改,如果您在预算范围内并且需要基本的重新加载功能,那么它是完美的。 In comparison JRebel works with over 100 frameworks like Spring, Hibernate etc which configuration DCEVM is not able to reload. 相比之下,JRebel使用了超过100个框架,如Spring,Hibernate等,这些配置DCEVM无法重新加载。

Difference is also in support. 差异也在支持。 While DCEVM is community supported on as is basis then commercial JRebel has professional support team to help you with any trouble you might have. 虽然DCEVM是基于社区支持的,但商业JRebel拥有专业的支持团队,可以帮助您解决任何问题。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM