[英]What's the relation between “generics” and “higher-order types”?
From this question: What is a higher kinded type in Scala? 从这个问题: Scala中什么是更高级的kinded类型? , I understand what is higher-order types
(also first-order type
and proper type
). ,我明白什么是higher-order types
(也是first-order type
和proper type
)。
But there is still a question: What's the relation between generics
and "higher-order types"? 但仍有一个问题: generics
与“高阶类型”之间的关系是什么?
I know Java supports generics
, which is like the first-order
type in Scala. 我知道Java支持generics
,这就像Scala中的first-order
类型。
Which of the following are correct? 以下哪项是正确的?
first-order type
is generics
在Scala中,只有first-order type
是generics
first-order
and higher-order
types are both belong to generics
在Scala中, first-order
和higher-order
类型都属于generics
generics
just mean first-order
type, it's not complete 在Java中, generics
只是first-order
类型,它并不完整 generics
is a common term means we can "abstract" on types, no matter first-order
or higher-order
generics
是一个常用术语,意味着我们可以“抽象”类型,无论是first-order
还是higher-order
I'd say (1.) is wrong. 我会说(1.)是错的。 I'm not sure about (3.) because I'm a bit out of practice concerning Java. 我不确定(3.)因为我在Java方面有点不合时宜。 But I'd say (4.) is pretty accurate and somewhat similar to (2.). 但我会说(4.)非常准确,有点类似于(2.)。
As far as I know, the term generics refers just to the usage of type parameters. 据我所知, 泛型一词仅指类型参数的用法。 It applies to both first-order and higher-order types or functions. 它适用于一阶和更高阶类型或函数。
Offtopic (and somewhat nerdish): Does anyone else see a hidden reference to Wing Commander in (2.) Offtopic(有些神经质):是否有其他人在(2.)中看到Wing Commander的隐藏引用
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.