佩莱（Pellet）是否对财产保护词汇表有理由？
[英]Does Pellet reason over the Property Reification vocabulary?
问题描述
I have been struggling with adding property reification to my owl ontologies and I came across a proposal in the W3 wiki for Property Reification . 
我一直在努力与添加属性具体化到我的猫头鹰本体和我在W3维基跨建议后来物业物化 。 I was wondering if Pellet (or any reasoner for that matter) is able to understand the vocabulary and reason over it, both natively and through SWRL rules. 我想知道Pellet（或该问题的任何推理者）是否能够通过本机或通过SWRL规则理解词汇及其推理。 The proposed vocabulary is located here . 拟议的词汇在这里 。
1 个解决方案
解决方案1
0 已采纳 2015-09-15 13:55:33
Looks like the spec is only a draft at the moment. 看起来规范目前只是草稿。 I'm not aware of any reasoner supporting it. 我不知道有任何理由支持。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.