简体   繁体   English

一组weak_ptr

[英]A set of weak_ptr

Here is the code:这是代码:

struct lex_compare {
    bool operator() (const weak_ptr<int> &lhs, const weak_ptr<int> &rhs)const {
        return *lhs.lock() < *rhs.lock();
    }
};

int main(){
    set<weak_ptr<int>,lex_compare> intset;
    intset.insert(make_shared<int>(1));

    cout << "intset size:" << intset.size() << endl; //1
    cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< intset.count(make_shared<int>(1))<<endl; // failed

}

I want to know how to count/find the weak_ptr<int> stored in intset and if a better method is available to do the same work?我想知道如何count/find存储在intsetweak_ptr<int>以及是否有更好的方法可以完成同样的工作?

You cannot insert temporary shared_ptr to set of weak pointers because it is memory leak in the sense that this stored weak pointer points to already deleted memory.您不能将临时 shared_ptr 插入一组弱指针,因为从这个存储的弱指针指向已删除的内存的意义上说,这是内存泄漏。

intset.insert(make_shared<int>(1)); 
// after this instruction shared_ptr destructor frees the memory

That is why you cannot find it in set - because *lhs.lock() is UB here.这就是为什么你不能在 set 中找到它 - 因为*lhs.lock()在这里是 UB。

See weak_ptr::lock doc .请参阅weak_ptr::lock 文档

You need to make your òrder operator in this way:您需要以这种方式制作 òrder 运算符:

struct lex_compare {
    bool operator() (const weak_ptr<int> &lhs, const weak_ptr<int> &rhs)const {
        auto lptr = lhs.lock(), rptr = rhs.lock();
        if (!rptr) return false; // nothing after expired pointer 
        if (!lptr) return true;  // every not expired after expired pointer
        return *lptr < *rptr;
    }
};

All that means - you need to have this shared_ptr sowmewhere to count it:所有这一切意味着 - 你需要有这个 shared_ptr sowmewhere 来计算它:

int main(){
    set<weak_ptr<int>,lex_compare> intset;
    auto shared1 = make_shared<int>(1); 
    intset.insert(shared1);

    cout << "intset size:" << intset.size() << endl; //1
    cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< intset.count(make_shared<int>(1))<<endl; // failed
}

With the above - your count will work.有了上述 - 您的计数将起作用。

Consider also to keep shared_ptr in set...还考虑保持 shared_ptr 设置...

[UPDATE] [更新]

marko in comments pointed the valid issue. marko 在评论中指出了有效的问题。 std::weak_ptr cannot be used as a key in a way you are using it at all. std::weak_ptr 根本不能以您使用它的方式用作键。 Only if you can ensure that pointed value will never change nor pointer itself will never expire.只有当你能确保指向的值永远不会改变,指针本身也永远不会过期。 See this example:看这个例子:

    set<weak_ptr<int>,lex_compare> intset;
    auto shared1 = make_shared<int>(1); 
    intset.insert(shared1);
    cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< intset.count(make_shared<int>(1))<<endl; // works
    shared1.reset();
    cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< intset.count(make_shared<int>(1))<<endl; // failed

And the other example:另一个例子:

    set<weak_ptr<int>,lex_compare> intset;
    auto shared1 = make_shared<int>(1); 
    intset.insert(shared1);
    cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< intset.count(make_shared<int>(1))<<endl; // works
    *shared1 = 2;
    cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< intset.count(make_shared<int>(1))<<endl; // failed

You can keep std::shared_ptr which prevents from out-of-set expiration of pointer - and std::shared_ptr has operator < - but this operator compares pointers themselves - not the pointed values - so better is std::set<std::shared_ptr<int>> - but the best would be std::set<int>您可以保留 std::shared_ptr 以防止指针的设置过期 - 并且 std::shared_ptr 具有operator < - 但该运算符比较指针本身 - 而不是指向的值 - 所以std::set<std::shared_ptr<int>>更好std::set<std::shared_ptr<int>> - 但最好的是std::set<int>

Or change std::set<...> --> std::vector<std::weak_ptr<int>> - and use count_if -- see:或更改std::set<...> --> std::vector<std::weak_ptr<int>> - 并使用count_if -- 请参阅:

vector<weak_ptr<int>> intset;
auto shared1 = make_shared<int>(1);
intset.push_back(shared1);
cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< count_if(begin(intset), end(intset), 
                                  [](auto&& elem) 
                                  { 
                                     auto ptr = elem.lock();
                                     return ptr && *ptr == 1; 
                                  }); 

Or with std::set<std::shared_ptr<int>> :或者使用std::set<std::shared_ptr<int>>

set<shared_ptr<int>> intset;
auto shared1 = make_shared<int>(1);
intset.insert(shared1);
// if you can ensure shared1 value will not change:
cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< intset.count(shared1);
// if not  - use count_if - the slower than std::count
cout << "Does 1 exist?"<< count_if(begin(intset), end(intset), 
                                  [](auto&& ptr) 
                                  { 
                                     return ptr && *ptr == 1; 
                                  }); 

shared_ptr does NOT implement flyweight pattern, which you seem to assume. shared_ptr没有实现您似乎假设的享元模式。

make_shared returns a pointer that is capable of being shared. make_shared返回一个可以共享的指针。 To get more pointers to the same object, you must use copy constructor or copy assignment operator, and pass the existing shared_ptr .要获得更多指向同一对象的指针,您必须使用复制构造函数或复制赋值运算符,并传递现有的shared_ptr

make_shared does NOT make an additional pointer to an existing object. make_shared不会生成指向现有对象的附加指针。 It creates a new object.它创建一个新对象。

Therefore, it is correct that intset.count(make_shared<int>(1)) returns 0 .因此, intset.count(make_shared<int>(1))返回0是正确的。 The just-created shared_ptr<int> does not exist anywhere in the set.刚刚创建的shared_ptr<int>在集合中的任何地方都不存在。

Successive calls to make_shared<int>(1) do not compare equal.连续调用make_shared<int>(1)比较不相等。

Then there's the additional brokenness associated with your comparison function.然后是与您的比较功能相关的额外损坏。 There is an ordering that works for weak_ptr , but that is not it.有一个适用于weak_ptr的排序,但事实并非如此。 Your unstable comparison function will cause set to badly misbehave.你不稳定的比较函数会导致set行为异常。

You should use simply set<int> .您应该简单地使用set<int>

我们可以使用标准的std::owner_less<>代替尝试为弱指针编写自己的比较函数并提出行为不端的解决方案。

It's a bad idea to have a set of weak pointers unless you implement a cleanup method and use it regularly.除非您实现清理方法并定期使用它,否则拥有一组弱指针是一个坏主意。 You might want to put a safeguard in your comparison function because at present the result is undefined.您可能希望在比较函数中设置保护措施,因为目前结果未定义。 Taking the advice from @PiotrNycz for example:以@PiotrNycz 的建议为例:

template <class T>
struct wptr_less_than 
{
    bool operator() ( const std::weak_ptr<T>& lhs, const std::weak_ptr<T>& rhs ) const {
        return lhs.expired() || (!rhs.expired() && *lhs.lock() < *rhs.lock());
    }
};

Counting valid weak pointers计算有效的弱指针

Use a combination of count_if and weak_ptr::expired :使用count_ifweak_ptr::expired的组合:

template <class T, class C, class A>
size_t count_valid_pointers( const std::set< std::weak_ptr<T>, C, A >& s )
{
    return s.size() - std::count_if( s.begin(), s.end(), 
         []( const std::weak_ptr<T>& wptr ){ return wptr.expired(); } 
    );
}

Finding an element with a specific value查找具有特定值的元素

You can use a static shared pointer to store the query (although this is kind of ugly):您可以使用静态共享指针来存储查询(尽管这有点难看):

template <class T, class C, class A>
typename std::set< std::weak_ptr<T>, C, A >::iterator
find_value( const std::set< std::weak_ptr<T>, C, A >& s, const T& val )
{
    static auto query = std::make_shared<T>();
    query.reset( const_cast<T*>(&val), []( T* ){} ) ;
    return s.find(query);
}

And an example:和一个例子:

#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <memory>
#include <set>

template <class T>
struct wptr_less_than 
{
    bool operator() ( const std::weak_ptr<T>& lhs, const std::weak_ptr<T>& rhs ) const {
        return lhs.expired() || (!rhs.expired() && *lhs.lock() < *rhs.lock());
    }
};

template <class T, class C, class A>
size_t count_valid_pointers( const std::set< std::weak_ptr<T>, C, A >& s )
{
    return s.size() - std::count_if( s.begin(), s.end(), 
         []( const std::weak_ptr<T>& wptr ){ return wptr.expired(); } 
    );
}

template <class T, class C, class A>
typename std::set< std::weak_ptr<T>, C, A >::iterator
find_value( const std::set< std::weak_ptr<T>, C, A >& s, const T& val )
{
    static auto query = std::make_shared<T>();
    query.reset( const_cast<T*>(&val), []( T* ){} ) ;
    return s.find(query);
}


int main()
{
    std::set< std::weak_ptr<int>, wptr_less_than<int> > intset;

    auto a = std::make_shared<int>(1);
    auto b = std::make_shared<int>(2);

    intset.insert(a); intset.insert(b); a.reset();

    std::cout << "intset size:" << intset.size() << std::endl; //2
    std::cout << "intset real size:" << count_valid_pointers(intset) << std::endl; //1

    if ( find_value(intset,2) != intset.end() )
        std::cout << "Found it!\n";
}

wrap up the weak_pointer in a container将 weak_pointer 包装在容器中

eg例如

template <class T> class WeakPtrAsKey {
  T * m_ptr;
    typedef std::shared_ptr<T> _Sptr;
    typedef std::weak_ptr<T> _Wptr;
    _Wptr m_wptr;
    public:
    WeakPtrAsKey():m_ptr(nullptr) {};
    WeakPtrAsKey(_Wptr wptr):m_ptr(wptr.lock().get()),m_wptr(wptr) {}
    WeakPtrAsKey(_Sptr sptr):m_ptr(sptr.get()),m_wptr(sptr) {}
    bool operator<(const WeakPtrAsKey<T> &other) const { return m_ptr<other.m_ptr;}
    bool operator==(const WeakPtrAsKey<T> &other) const { return m_ptr==other.m_ptr;}
    _Wptr getWeak() const { return m_wptr;}
    _Sptr lock() const { return m_wptr.lock();}
};

and use it as:并将其用作:

std::set<WeakPtrAsKey<MyKey>> mySet;
std::map<WeakPtrAsKey<MyKey>,MyVal> myMap;

usage examples:用法示例:

void addToMap(std::weak_ptr<MyKey> key, const MyVal &val)
{
  myMap[key]=val
}
void addToMap(std::shared_ptr<MyKey> key, const MyVal &val)
{
  myMap[key]=val
}
std::shared_ptr<MyKey> getFirstKey()
{
  auto it=myMap.begin();
  return=it->first.lock();
}

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM