简体   繁体   English

appgyver类固醇和appgyver Supersonic之间的区别

[英]differences between appgyver Steroids and appgyver Supersonic

I am looking for some differences between the steroids and supersonic. 我正在寻找类固醇和超音速之间的差异。 I read that supersonic is based on steroids but I can't find more big differences. 我读到超音速是基于类固醇的,但我找不到更多的不同之处。 Both support some cloud tooling. 两者都支持一些云工具。

If supersonic is kind of "better Steroids", will Steroids project be less supported? 如果超音速是“更好的类固醇”,类固醇投影是否会受到较少的支持?

Does any of these support local build also? 这些都支持本地构建吗? Building in the cloud is kind of risky in my opinion. 我认为,在云中进行构建有点冒险。

There are two different project types right now when you use the command line interface with Appgyver. 当您在Appgyver中使用命令行界面时,现在有两种不同的项目类型。 If you want to build a single page application, you will not have Angular included in your project. 如果要构建单页应用程序,则项目中将不包含Angular。 If you build with the multi page application option, Angular is the javascript framework of choice. 如果使用多页应用程序选项进行构建,则Angular是选择的javascript框架。 You can use your own framework if needed on both types. 如果两种类型都需要,则可以使用自己的框架。 Here is a piece of the documentation on creating a new project: 以下是有关创建新项目的文档:

Note: Even though we recommend using Angular, Supersonic is framework agnostic. 注意:即使我们建议使用Angular,Supersonic也与框架无关。 If you prefer a different framework, choose Single-Page application when prompted for application type, and create the app structure yourself. 如果您希望使用其他框架,请在提示输入应用程序类型时选择“单页应用程序”,然后自己创建应用程序结构。

Those are the main differences. 这些是主要区别。 Supersonic handles the view push/pull/transitions to make it look and feel like a native application. Supersonic处理视图推/拉/转换,使其看起来和感觉像本机应用程序。 Lots of native functionality is wrapped in Supersonic methods. Supersonic方法中包装了许多本机功能。

It is worth reading in the docs to learn a bit more about this. 值得在文档中阅读以了解更多有关此的知识。

The projects are deployed to the Appgyver cloud where you can choose to create builds for Android and iOS separately with a great interface for adding your icons and splashscreens as well as plugins. 这些项目已部署到Appgyver云中,您可以在其中选择分别为Android和iOS创建构建的版本,并具有一个不错的界面来添加图标,启动画面以及插件。

There is no local build option that I have seen with this product. 我没有看到该产品的本地构建选项。 One nice feature is the simulator build which allows you to run the simulator with any plugins you've included in your build. 模拟器构建是一个不错的功能,它允许您使用构建中包含的任何插件来运行模拟器。

Overall, I have had a good experience developing with this product for over a year now. 总体而言,我在使用该产品进行开发方面已有超过一年的经验。 I was able to get an app in the Apple Store in little time, and with the help of the build service documentation. 借助构建服务文档,我很快就能在Apple Store中获得一个应用程序。 This has made the process easy. 这使过程变得容易。

I'd recommend trying it out. 我建议尝试一下。 The forum is getting more attention and is very helpful. 论坛越来越受到关注,并且非常有帮助。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM