ES6 解构和模块导入

Question

I was under the impression that this syntax:

import Router from 'react-router';
var {Link} = Router;

has the same final result as this:

import {Link} from 'react-router';

Can someone explain what the difference is?

(I originally thought it was a React Router Bug .)

Answer 1

import {Link} from 'react-router';

imports a named export from react-router , ie something like

export const Link = 42;

---

import Router from 'react-router';
const {Link} = Router;

pulls out the property Link from the default export , assuming it is an object, eg

export default {
  Link: 42
};

(the default export is actually nothing but a standardized named export with the name "default").

See also export on MDN .

Complete example:

// react-router.js
export const Link = 42;
export default {
  Link: 21,
};


// something.js
import {Link} from './react-router';
import Router from './react-router';
const {Link: Link2} = Router;

console.log(Link); // 42
console.log(Link2); // 21

---

With Babel 5 and below I believe they have been interchangeable because of the way ES6 modules have been transpiled to CommonJS. But those are two different constructs as far as the language goes.

Answer 2

To do this:

import {purple, grey} from 'themeColors';

Without repeating export const for each symbol , just do:

export const
  purple = '#BADA55',
  grey = '#l0l',
  gray = grey,
  default = 'this line actually causes an error';

Answer 3

Except for different exports, it may also lead to different bundled code by WebPack when using two variant ways to destruct ESM modules:

1. Destruct within the import statement:

    import {Link} from 'react-router'; Link('1'); Link('2');

    // WebPack output var util_mobileValidator__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__ = __webpack_require__(1); (0,util_mobileValidator__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__.Link)('1'); (0,util_mobileValidator__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__.Link)('2');

2. Use destructuring syntax:

    import Router from 'react-router'; const {Link} = Router; Link('1'); Link('2');

    // WebPack output: var util_mobileValidator__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__ = __webpack_require__(1); const {Link} = util_mobileValidator__WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_3__; Link(1); Link(2);

As you can see in the output example above where there is redundant code, which is not good for optimization when trying to uglify via UglifyJS , or Terser .