简体   繁体   English

当我尝试使用Guice覆盖通用绑定时,为什么会出现错误? (TypeLiteral)

[英]Why do I have an error when I try to override a generic binding with Guice? (TypeLiteral)

I'd like to override a generic type binding, but I allways got the same " No implementation was bound " error. 我想覆盖泛型类型绑定,但我总是得到相同的“ No implementation was bound ”错误。

I'm using roboguice 3. 我正在使用roboguice 3。

Here is a exemple of code that I use: 这是我使用的代码示例:

public interface IParser<I, O> {}

public class Parser1 implements IParser<String, String> {
    IParser<String, String> mParser;

    @Inject
    public Parser1(IParser<String, String> parser) {
        mParser = parser;
    }
}

public class Parser2 extends Parser1 {
    @Inject
    public Parser2(IParser<String, String> parser) {
        super(parser);
    }
}

public class MyModule extends AbstractModule {
    @Override
    protected void configure() {
        bind(new TypeLiteral<IParser<String, String>>() {}).to(new TypeLiteral<Parser1>() {});
    }
}

And here is my injector creation : 这是我的注射器创建:

RoboGuice.getOrCreateBaseApplicationInjector(this,
                RoboGuice.DEFAULT_STAGE,
                RoboGuice.newDefaultRoboModule(this),
                Modules.override(new MyModule()).with(new AbstractModule() {
                    @Override
                    protected void configure() {
                        bind(new TypeLiteral<IParser<String, String>>() {}).to(new TypeLiteral<Parser2>() {});
                    }
                })
);

If I don't try to override it (only user Parser1), all is fine, when I override standard object with providers, it works well too, but not with TypeLiteral. 如果我不尝试覆盖它(只有用户Parser1),一切都很好,当我用提供者覆盖标准对象时,它也可以很好地工作,但不能用于TypeLiteral。

My error is : 我的错误是:

com.google.inject.CreationException: Unable to create injector, see the following errors:
1) No implementation for IParser<String, String> was bound.

What am I doing wrong? 我究竟做错了什么?

Thanks. 谢谢。

You should change definition of classes which are implemented your interface. 您应该更改实现接口的类的定义。

Try this: 尝试这个:

public class Parser1<I, O> implements IParser<I, O> {
}
public class Parser2<I, O> extends Parser1<I, O> {
}

And then you can bind your interface to class by this way: 然后,您可以通过以下方式将您的接口绑定到类:

bind(new TypeLiteral<IParser<String, String>>() {}).to(new TypeLiteral<Parser1<String, String>() {});

I'm not shure, but it looks remarkable to me that a binding to a conrete instance is used instead to a Class : 我并不害羞,但对于我来说,使用conrete实例的绑定代替Class是非常值得注意的:

bind(new TypeLiteral>() {}).to( new TypeLiteral() {} ); bind(new TypeLiteral>(){})。to( new TypeLiteral(){} );

did you try 你试过了吗

bind(new TypeLiteral<IParser<String, String>>() {}).to(Parser2.class});

?

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM