简体   繁体   English

dnxcore50与dnx451的性能比较? (CoreClr与.net Framework)

[英]Performance comparison of dnxcore50 vs dnx451? (CoreClr vs .net Framework)

I have tried to find some data on performance of these two targets compared, but did not succeed. 我试图比较这两个目标的性能,但没有成功。 I am interested in a asp.net5 web application that runs on Windows (Or azure web app eg). 我对Windows上运行的asp.net5 Web应用程序(或例如Azure Web应用程序)感兴趣。 Is there any significant difference in performance or from that point of view the targets are roughly equal? 在性能上是否有任何显着差异,或者从这个角度来看,目标大致相等?

As far as benchmarks are concerned, they can all be found on GitHub on aspnet/benchmarks 就基准而言,它们都可以在aspnet / benchmarks的 GitHub上找到

They even include the tools and procedure to run the benchmark yourself on your system. 它们甚至包括自己在系统上运行基准测试的工具和过程。

So far, ASP.NET 4.6 is able to handle 57,843 requests per seconds. 到目前为止,ASP.NET 4.6每秒能够处理57,843个请求。 And ASP.NET 5 on Kestrel can handle 168,005 requests per seconds. Kestrel上的ASP.NET 5每秒可以处理168,005个请求。

As for performance differences, you might be interested in all the bugs currently open: 至于性能差异,您可能会对当前打开的所有错误感兴趣:

Lots of work needs to be done before RTM. 在RTM之前,需要完成许多工作。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM