简体繁体 English

Reactive和Reactive Streams有什么区别？

[英]What's the difference between Reactive and Reactive Streams?

原文 2015-12-20 23:38:32 7 1 java/ rx-java/ reactive-programming/ reactive-streams

I'm trying to understand the difference between Reactive and ReactiveStreams, specifically in the context of RxJava ? 我试图理解Reactive和ReactiveStream之间的区别，特别是在RxJava的上下文中？

The most I could figure out was that Reactive Streams has some notion of backpressure in the specification but that already exists in RxJava/Reactive with the request(n) interface. 我能想到的最多的是Reactive Streams在规范中有一些背压概念，但已经存在于RxJava / Reactive中的request(n)接口。

Wouldn't mind a ELI5 answer. 不介意ELI5的答案。

1 个解决方案

The design of Reactive Streams was a joint effort from several engineers to define a standard minimum set of components that support (potentially) asynchronous event delivery with backpressure (and synchronous cancellation). Reactive Streams的设计是由几位工程师共同努力定义的一组标准最小组件，支持（可能）具有背压（和同步取消）的异步事件传递。 It was mainly influenced by RxJava in its design along with Akka. 它的设计主要受到RxJava和Akka的影响。

However, the resulting design was significanlty different from RxJava so RxJava 1.x would require a lot of binary-incompatible changes to make itself compliant. 但是，由此产生的设计与RxJava有很大不同，因此RxJava 1.x需要进行大量二进制不兼容的更改才能使其自身兼容。 Instead, we have an RxJavaReactiveStreams bridge and RxJava 2.0 was reimplemented by Reactive-Streams norms completely. 相反，我们有一个RxJavaReactiveStreams桥，RxJava 2.0完全由Reactive-Streams规范重新实现。

I have a four part blog series about Reactive-Streams in the light of RxJava. 根据RxJava，我有一个关于Reactive-Streams 的四部分博客系列。