简体   繁体   English

自定义迭代器类中重载的`!=`运算符无法正常工作

[英]Overloaded `!=` operator in custom iterator class is not working properly

I am creating template matrix class and right now I am implementing iterator class to iterate through one column (this iterator class is inside my Matrix<T> class). 我正在创建模板矩阵类,现在我正在实现迭代器类来迭代一个列(这个迭代器类在我的Matrix<T>类中)。

template <typename P, typename V> // "P" - PointerType; "V" - ValueType
class V_Iterator : public std::iterator<std::forward_iterator_tag, T> {
private:
    P itData_;
public:
    size_type w; // width of the matrix
    size_type h; // height of the matrix
public:
    V_Iterator(P d) : itData_(d) { }

public:
    V& operator*() const {
        return *itData_;
    }
    /////////////////// BUG /////////
    V_Iterator<P, V>& operator++() {

        itData_ += w;

        return *this;
    }
    V_Iterator<P, V>& operator= (T value) {
        *itData_ = value;
        return *this;
    }
    P operator->() {
        return itData_;
    }
    friend bool operator==(const V_Iterator& lhs, const V_Iterator& rhs) {
        return !(lhs.itData_ != rhs.itData_);
    }
    friend bool operator!=(const V_Iterator& lhs, const V_Iterator& rhs) {
        return !(lhs.itData_ == rhs.itData_);
    }

    V_Iterator<P, V> begin(size_type column) { return V_Iterator<P, V>(itData_ + column); }
    V_Iterator<P, V> end(size_type column) { return V_Iterator<P, V>((itData_ + column) + 1 + (h - 1) * w ); };
};

My problem is that when I am iterating using my iterator: 我的问题是当我使用迭代器迭代时:

Matrix<int> m (5, 5);
for (Matrix<int>::viterator vit = m.v_begin(0); vit != m.v_end(0); ++vit) {
    cout << *vit << " ";
}

it never stops because != is never triggered. 它永远不会停止,因为!=永远不会被触发。 However if in overloading ++ operator is this code instead of one I already posted 但是,如果在重载++运算符是这个代码而不是我已发布的代码

V_Iterator<P, V>& operator++() {
    ++itData_;
    return *this;
}

It is working completely fine. 它工作得很好。

Here is more code inside my Matrix class: 这是我的Matrix类中的更多代码:

public:
V_Iterator<T*, T> m_viterator_;
V_Iterator<const T*, const T> m_const_viterator_;

typedef V_Iterator<T*, T> viterator;
typedef V_Iterator<const T*, const T> const_viterator;

viterator v_begin(size_type column) { return m_viterator_.begin(column); }
viterator v_end(size_type column) { return m_viterator_.end(column); }
const_viterator cv_begin(size_type column) { return m_const_hiterator_.begin(column); }
const_viterator cv_end(size_type column) { return m_const_hiterator_.end(column); }

Matrix class constructor: Matrix类构造函数:

Matrix(const size_type& width, const size_type& height) :   width_(width),
                                                            height_(height),
                                                            data_(CreateMatrix(width, height)),                                                                m_viterator_(*data_),
                                                            m_const_viterator_(*data_) {

    m_viterator_.w = width_;
    m_viterator_.h = height_;
    m_const_viterator_.w = width_;
    m_const_viterator_.h = height_;

    // fill the created matrix with default values of "T"
    for (Matrix<T>::iterator_type it = this->begin(); it != this->end(); ++it)
        *it = T();
}

I was trying to figure out what is wrong but to me everything seems ok. 我试图弄清楚出了什么问题,但对我来说一切似乎都没问题。

As it's being pointed out in the comments, it's not shown how the w member gets initialized. 正如评论中指出的那样,没有显示w成员如何初始化。 However, I also spotted something else. 但是,我也发现了别的东西。 I'm going to assume that the rest of the code that's not shown is going to initialize w correctly. 我将假设未显示的其余代码将正确初始化w Let's look at how you defined begin() and end(). 让我们看一下你如何定义begin()和end()。

V_Iterator<P, V> begin(size_type column)
{
     return V_Iterator<P, V>(itData_ + column);
}

V_Iterator<P, V> end(size_type column)
{
     return V_Iterator<P, V>((itData_ + column) + 1 + (h - 1) * w);
}

So, it looks to me like the distance between begin(n) end end(n) or end(n)-begin(n) is: 所以,在我看来,begin(n)end end(n)或end(n)-begin(n)之间的距离是:

(itData_ + column) + 1 + (h - 1) * w - (itData_ + column)

or 要么

1 + (h - 1) * w

You have stated the problem as follows: when your ++ operator keeps advancing the iterator by w each time, the loop iterating from begin to end will never compare equal to the ending iterator value. 你已经说明了这个问题如下:当你的++运算符每次都按w推进迭代器时,从beginend迭代的循环永远不会比较等于结束迭代器值。

Of course not, because the distance between them will never be an even multiple of w ! 当然不是,因为它们之间的距离永远不会是w的偶数倍!

The iterator returned by the begin() and end() member functions does not have w and h initialised. begin()end()成员函数返回的迭代器没有wh初始化。 You set them in the m_viterator member, but the member functions begin() and end() of the iterator class return an iterator initialised from the itData_ member only, which leaves w and h in the newly created iterator uninitialised. 您可以在m_viterator成员中设置它们,但迭代器类的成员函数begin()end()返回itData_成员初始化的迭代器,这将在新创建的迭代器中itData_未初始化的wh

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM