除了内部/外部链接之外，类型是否仅具有“链接”？
[英]Does a type just have 'linkage' other than internal/external linkage?
问题描述
3.5 [basic.link] paragraph 8 from N4567 says that 
3.5 [basic.link]从N4567第8段说
... A type is said to have linkage if and only if:
- it is a class or enumeration type that is named (or has a name for linkage purposes (7.1.3)) and the name has linkage;
- ...
which exclusively elaborates on linkage of types—one of the entities that a name can denote. 专门阐述类型的链接-名称可以表示的实体之一。 However, it seems that there is no information in this paragraph whether the linkage that a type shall have is internal or external . 但是， 在此段中似乎没有信息，类型应该具有的链接是内部的还是外部的 。 Is it because there is no need to define it at all, or because it is already defined by other paragraphs? 是因为根本不需要定义它，还是因为其他段落已经定义了它？
1 个解决方案
解决方案1
0 已采纳 2016-02-11 17:54:43
The type either has linkage, or it doesn't. 该类型要么具有链接，要么没有。 This paragraph is self-contained: the first half defines the notion of a type having linkage, and the second half describes restrictions on the use of types having no linkage. 本段是独立的：上半部分定义了具有链接的类型的概念，下半部分描述了对不具有链接的类型的使用的限制。 The notion of linkage of a type is not used anywhere else, as far as I can tell. 据我所知，在其他任何地方都没有使用类型链接的概念。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页，遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议，如果您需要转载，请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.