std :: atomic_flag停止多个线程

Question

I'm trying to stop multiple worker threads using a std::atomic_flag . Starting from Issue using std::atomic_flag with worker thread the following works:

#include <iostream>
#include <atomic>
#include <chrono>
#include <thread>

std::atomic_flag continueFlag;
std::thread t;

void work()
{
    while (continueFlag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_relaxed)) {
        std::cout << "work ";
        std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(10));
    }
}

void start()
{
    continueFlag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_relaxed);
    t = std::thread(&work);
}

void stop()
{
    continueFlag.clear(std::memory_order_relaxed);
    t.join();
}

int main()
{
    std::cout << "Start" << std::endl;
    start();
    std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(200));
    std::cout << "Stop" << std::endl;
    stop();
    std::cout << "Stopped." << std::endl;

    return 0;
}

Trying to rewrite into multiple worker threads:

#include <iostream>
#include <atomic>
#include <chrono>
#include <thread>
#include <vector>
#include <memory>

struct thread_data {
    std::atomic_flag continueFlag;
    std::thread thread;
};

std::vector<thread_data> threads;

void work(int threadNum, std::atomic_flag &continueFlag)
{
    while (continueFlag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_relaxed)) {
        std::cout << "work" << threadNum << " ";
        std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(10));
    }
}

void start()
{
    const unsigned int numThreads = 2;

    for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) {
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //PROBLEM SECTOR
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        thread_data td;
        td.continueFlag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_relaxed);

        td.thread = std::thread(&work, i, td.continueFlag);

        threads.push_back(std::move(td));
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
        //PROBLEM SECTOR
        ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
    }
}

void stop()
{
    //Flag stop
    for (auto &data : threads) {
        data.continueFlag.clear(std::memory_order_relaxed);
    }
    //Join
    for (auto &data : threads) {
        data.thread.join();
    }
    threads.clear();
}

int main()
{
    std::cout << "Start" << std::endl;
    start();
    std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(200));
    std::cout << "Stop" << std::endl;
    stop();
    std::cout << "Stopped." << std::endl;

    return 0;
}

My issue is "Problem Sector" in above. Namely creating the threads. I cannot wrap my head around how to instantiate the threads and passing the variables to the work thread.

The error right now is referencing this line threads.push_back(std::move(td)); with error Error C2280 'thread_data::thread_data(const thread_data &)': attempting to reference a deleted function .

Trying to use unique_ptr like this:

        auto td = std::make_unique<thread_data>();
        td->continueFlag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_relaxed);

        td->thread = std::thread(&work, i, td->continueFlag);

        threads.push_back(std::move(td));

Gives error std::atomic_flag::atomic_flag(const std::atomic_flag &)': attempting to reference a deleted function at line td->thread = std::thread(&work, i, td->continueFlag); . Am I fundamentally misunderstanding the use of std::atomic_flag? Is it really both immovable and uncopyable?

Answer 1

Your first approach was actually closer to the truth. The problem is that it passed a reference to an object within the local for loop scope to each thread, as a parameter. But, of course, once the loop iteration ended, that object went out of scope and got destroyed, leaving each thread with a reference to a destroyed object, resulting in undefined behavior.

Nobody cared about the fact that you moved the object into the std::vector , after creating the thread. The thread received a reference to a locally-scoped object, and that's all it knew. End of story.

Moving the object into the vector first, and then passing to each thread a reference to the object in the std::vector will not work either. As soon as the vector internally reallocates, as part of its natural growth, you'll be in the same pickle.

What needs to happen is to have the entire threads array created first, before actually starting any std::thread s. If the RAII principle is religiously followed, that means nothing more than a simple call to std::vector::resize() .

Then, in a second loop, iterate over the fully-cooked threads array, and go and spawn off a std::thread for each element in the array.

Answer 2

I was almost there with my unique_ptr solution. I just needed to pass the call as a std::ref() as such:

std::vector<std::unique_ptr<thread_data>> threads;

void start()
{
    const unsigned int numThreads = 2;

    for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) {
        auto td = std::make_unique<thread_data>();
        td->continueFlag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_relaxed);
        td->thread = std::thread(&work, i, std::ref(td->continueFlag));

        threads.push_back(std::move(td));
    }
}

However, inspired by Sam above I also figured a non-pointer way:

std::vector<thread_data> threads;

void start()
{
    const unsigned int numThreads = 2;

    //create new vector, resize doesn't work as it tries to assign/copy which atomic_flag
    //does not support
    threads = std::vector<thread_data>(numThreads);
    for (int i = 0; i < numThreads; i++) {
        auto& t = threads.at(i);
        t.continueFlag.test_and_set(std::memory_order_relaxed);
        t.thread = std::thread(&work, i, std::ref(t.continueFlag));
    }
}