[英]Why isn't my promise getting resolved?
I have two functions - A helper function for downloading files which is as follows 我有两个功能-一个下载文件的辅助功能,如下
var downloadHelper = function(url, saveDir) {
var deferred = Q.defer();
setTimeout(function() {
deferred.resolve("success");
}, 2000);
return deferred.promise;
}
Now I have a list of files to be downloaded in parallel. 现在,我有了要并行下载的文件列表。 I have the logic for that function as follows:
我对该函数的逻辑如下:
var downloadAll = function() {
var fileDownloadList = []
for(var key in config.files) {
var deferred = Q.defer();
var saveLocation = __base + config.localDir
downloadHelper(
config.files[key],
saveLocation
).then(function() {
deferred.resolve("downloaded: " + fileUrl);
}).catch(function(err) {
deferred.reject(err);
});
fileDownloadList.push(deferred.promise);
}
Q.all(fileDownloadList).done(function() {
console.log("All downloaded");
},function(err) {
console.log(err);
});
setTimeout(function() {
console.log(fileDownloadList);
}, 10000);
}
The done is never getting called! 完成永远不会被召唤!
For debugging purposes, I added a setTimeout that will be called after 10 seconds and what I see is that out of 2 files, the second promise is resolved and the first one is still in pending state. 出于调试目的,我添加了一个setTimeout,它将在10秒后调用,并且我看到的是2个文件中的第2个承诺已解决,第一个仍处于待处理状态。
Any ideas? 有任何想法吗?
Thanks in advance 提前致谢
One way to make your code work 一种使代码正常工作的方法
for(var key in config.files) {
(function() {
var deferred = Q.defer();
var saveLocation = __base + config.localDir
downloadHelper(
config.files[key],
saveLocation
).then(function() {
deferred.resolve("downloaded: " + fileUrl);
}).catch(function(err) {
deferred.reject(err);
});
fileDownloadList.push(deferred.promise);
}());
}
But since downloadhelper returns a promise, no need to create yet another one 但是由于downloadhelper返回了一个承诺,因此无需创建另一个
for (var key in config.files) {
var saveLocation = __base + config.localDir
fileDownloadList.push(downloadHelper(
config.files[key],
saveLocation
).then(function () {
return("downloaded: " + fileUrl);
}));
}
You'll see I removed 你会看到我被删除
.catch(function(err) {
deferred.reject(err);
})
That's redundant, it's the same as not having the catch at all 这是多余的,就像根本没有抓住一样
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.