[英]Objective-C: Are blocks defined inside of methods strong or weak?
I have a situation like this:我有这样的情况:
- (void)someMethod
{
__weak typeof(self) weakSelf = self;
void (^myBlock1)(void) = ^{
// ... do stuff
};
void (^myBlock2)(void) = ^{
[weakSelf doSomeHeavyNetworkCall2:^{
myBlock1();
}];
};
[self doSomeHeavyNetworkCall1:^{
myBlock2();
}];
}
What is the life cycle of myBlock1 and myBlock2 in this case?在这种情况下,myBlock1 和 myBlock2 的生命周期是什么? Should I be checking for nil like this?我应该像这样检查 nil 吗?
void (^myBlock2)(void) = ^{
[weakSelf doSomeHeavyNetworkCall2:^{
if (myBlock1) {
myBlock1();
}
}];
};
[self doSomeHeavyNetworkCall1:^{
if (myBlock2) {
myBlock2();
}
}];
Also if I wrap the entire someMethod
in @synchronized
, am I guaranteed to have the blocks around?另外,如果我将整个someMethod
包装在@synchronized
,我是否保证周围有块?
Local variables are strong by default in Objective-C so myBlock1
and myBlock2
are strong.在 Objective-C 中,局部变量默认是强的,所以myBlock1
和myBlock2
是强的。 There is no need for the if (myBlock1)
and if (myBlock2)
checks.不需要if (myBlock1)
和if (myBlock2)
检查。
Wrapping the contents of someMethod
with @synchronized
has no effect on the lifecycle of these variables.用@synchronized
包装someMethod
的内容对这些变量的生命周期没有影响。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.