[英]Correct way of unit-testing classes that use DateTimeOffset objects?
I would appreciate information or examples about how to correctly test code that uses DateTimeOffset instances. 我将非常感谢有关如何正确测试使用DateTimeOffset实例的代码的信息或示例。 I know the tests have to be deterministic. 我知道测试必须是确定性的。
So, how would one isolate the application from the DateTimeOffset classes ? 那么,如何将应用程序与DateTimeOffset类隔离开来呢? I would, of course, like to be able to use a fake DateTimeOffset.Now, etc. 当然,我希望能够使用假的DateTimeOffset.Now等。
In my tests, should I be using something like: 在我的测试中,我应该使用类似的东西:
var myDate = new DateTimeOffset(2016, 3, 29, 12, 20, 35, 93, TimeSpan.FromHours(-3));
Or would I instead be using a wrapper class like MyCustomDateTimeOffset ? 或者我会使用像MyCustomDateTimeOffset这样的包装类? Should I not use DateTimeOffset at all in my code and use a wrapper instead? 我的代码中根本不应该使用DateTimeOffset而是使用包装器吗?
As the fundamentals theorem says: 正如基本原理所说:
We can solve any problem by introducing an extra level of indirection. 我们可以通过引入额外的间接层来解决任何问题。
You don't really need a wrapper, all you need is to avoid DateTimeOffset.Now
/ DateTimeOffset.UtcNow
. 你真的不需要一个包装器,你只需要避免使用DateTimeOffset.Now
/ DateTimeOffset.UtcNow
。
Here are a few ways you could handle that: 以下是您可以处理的几种方法:
If you use dependency injection, write an IClock
interface which exposes the Now
/ UtcNow
properties. 如果使用依赖注入,请编写一个公开Now
/ UtcNow
属性的IClock
接口。
public interface IClock { DateTimeOffset Now { get; } DateTimeOffset UtcNow { get; } } internal class Clock : IClock { public DateTimeOffset Now => DateTimeOffset.Now; public DateTimeOffset UtcNow => DateTimeOffset.UtcNow; }
In your tests, you just mock the interface as you wish. 在您的测试中,您只需按照自己的意愿模拟界面。
If you'd rather keep using a static property, write a static type, let's say Clock
, and use that. 如果你宁愿继续使用静态属性,写一个静态类型,比如说Clock
,然后使用它。
public static class Clock { internal static Func<DateTimeOffset> DateTimeOffsetProvider { get; set; } = () => DateTimeOffset.Now; public static DateTimeOffset Now => DateTimeOffsetProvider(); public static DateTimeOffset UtcNow => DateTimeOffsetProvider().ToUniversalTime(); }
In your tests, you can substitute DateTimeOffsetProvider
. 在测试中,您可以替换DateTimeOffsetProvider
。
Here's a .NET 2 version: 这是一个.NET 2版本:
public static class Clock { internal delegate DateTimeOffset DateTimeOffsetProviderDelegate(); internal static DateTimeOffsetProviderDelegate DateTimeOffsetProvider { get; set; } public static DateTimeOffset Now { get { return DateTimeOffsetProvider(); } } public static DateTimeOffset UtcNow { get { return DateTimeOffsetProvider().ToUniversalTime(); } } static Clock() { DateTimeOffsetProvider = delegate() { return DateTimeOffset.Now; }; } }
As you won't know the value of DateTimeOffSet.Now, then all you can't assert that DateTimeOffSet.Now equals a value. 因为你不知道DateTimeOffSet.Now的值,所以你不能断言DateTimeOffSet.Now等于一个值。
You probably should refactor to use one of two methods: 您可能应该重构使用以下两种方法之一:
DI means instead of having the method determine the date, you pass it in. DI意味着不是让方法确定日期,而是传递它。
This method . 这种方法。 . 。 . 。
public void DoSomething()
{
var now = DateTimeOffSet.Now;
// Do other stuff with the date
}
. 。 . 。 . 。 would change to this method 会改变这种方法
public void DoSomething(DateTimeOffSet dtos)
{
// Do other stuff with the date
}
Your other option (although in the end you would use DI with this too) is to create an Interface and a Wrapper. 你的另一个选择(虽然最后你也会使用DI)是创建一个接口和一个包装器。 Then use you the interface in your object instead of a concrete DateTimeOffSet, so you can then use MOQ or other testing library to moq the interface. 然后使用对象中的接口而不是具体的DateTimeOffSet,这样您就可以使用MOQ或其他测试库来设置接口。 Check out SystemWrapper ( https://github.com/jozefizso/SystemWrapper ) project for an example. 查看SystemWrapper( https://github.com/jozefizso/SystemWrapper )项目以获取示例。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.