用于生成无偏图进行快速检查的任意实例

Question

module Main where

import Test.QuickCheck
import Data.Set as Set    

data Edge v = Edge {source :: v, target :: v}
                  deriving (Show,Eq,Ord)

data Graph v = Graph {nodes :: Set v, edges :: Set (Edge v)}
               deriving Show

instance Arbitrary v => Int-> Arbitrary (Edge v) where
    arbitrary = sized aux 
        where aux n = do s <- arbitrary
                         t <- arbitrary `suchThat` (/= s)
                         return $ Edge {source = s, target = t}


instance (Ord v, Arbitrary v) => Arbitrary (Graph v) where
    arbitrary = aux `suchThat` isValid
        where aux = do ns <- arbitrary 
                       es <- arbitrary 
                       return $ Graph {nodes = fromList ns, edges = fromList es}

This current definition of the instance is generating graphs with few edges, how do I alter it so it's less biased and it satisfies these two functions? :

-- | The function 'isDAG' tests if the graph is acyclic.

isDAG :: Ord v => Graph v -> Bool
isDAG g = isValid g && all nocycle (nodes g)
    where nocycle v = all (\a -> v `notMember` reachable g a) $ Set.map target (adj g v)

-- | The function 'isForest' tests if a valid DAG is a florest (a set of trees), in other words, -- if every node(vertex) has a maximum of one adjacent.

isForest :: Ord v => DAG v -> Bool
isForest g = isDAG g && all (\v -> length (adj g v) <= 1) (nodes g)

Answer 1

First you must figure out how to construct a graph which satisfies those properties.

DAG: If your nodes admit some ordering, and for each edge (u,v) you have u < v then the graph is acyclic. This ordering can be any ordering at all, so you can just manufacture an arbitrary ordering on the set of nodes in the graph.

Forest: If your graph has no edges, this property is trivially satisfied. Initially you can add any edge whose source is any node. If you add an edge, remove the source of that edge from the remaining available nodes.

I guess the big question is how to translate this to code. QuickCheck provides many combinators, esp. for selecting from lists, with and without replacement, of various sizes, etc.

instance (Ord v, Arbitrary v) => Arbitrary (Graph v) where 
  arbitrary = do 
    ns <- Set.fromList <$> liftA2 (++) (replicateM 10 arbitrary) arbitrary

First you generate a random set of nodes.

    let ns' = map reverse $ drop 2 $ inits $ Set.toList ns 

For each node, this computes the (non-empty) set of nodes which are "greater" than that node. Here "greater" just means according to the arbitrary ordering induced by the order of the elements in the list. This gets you the DAG property.

    es <- sublistOf ns' >>= 
            mapM (\(f:ts) -> Edge f <$> elements ts)

You then get a random sublist of that list (which gets you the forest property), and for each element in that random sublist, you create an edge pointing from the "largest" node in that set to one that is "smaller".

    return $ Graph ns (Set.fromList es) 

Then you're done! Test like so:

main = quickCheck $ forAll arbitrary (liftA2 (&&) (isDAG :: Graph Integer -> Bool) isForest)

Answer 2

A natural way of constructing graphs is inductively, adding one node at a time. Then it becomes quite easy to ensure the required properties hold:

• If for each added node its edges point only to existing nodes (and not in the other direction), we ensure the DAG property.
• If there is at most one edge going from a node, we ensure the forest property. (As you didn't provide the adj function, it's not clear if by "forest" you mean there is at most one edge going from a node or to a node.)

So the process of generating such a graph would go as follows:

1. Generate a list of random nodes.
2. Construct a graph by add them one by one. For each node, either add a random edge to one of the already added nodes, or no edge (decide randomly).

The main factor here is deciding whether to add an edge or not. By tweaking this parameter you get more or less trees in your forest. One option is to use frequency for that.