简体   繁体   English

OWL时间中的时间序列成员重复

[英]Recurring on Temporal Seq Member in OWL Time

A paper about an extension of the OWL Time-Temporal Aggregates Ontology-details how to represent recurring event using OWL Time. 一篇有关OWL时间-时间聚合本体扩展的论文详细介绍了如何使用OWL时间表示重复事件。

I am unsure about the representation of a particular recurring event. 我不确定特定重复事件的表示形式。 This is because it is unclear about whether a TemporalSeqMember can be itself a TemporalSeq. 这是因为尚不清楚TemporalSeqMember是否本身可以是TemporalSeq。 Secondly, I do not think that I correctly understood the essence of TemporalSeqMember 其次,我认为我没有正确理解TemporalSeqMember的本质

I have two questions: 我有两个问题:

  1. What is the usefulness of TemporalSeqMember TemporalSeqMember的作用是什么
  2. Is the following modelling the right way to model represent a recurring event which happens yearly, in month April & May in the first 1,2 hour, ie at 00:00-00:59 and 1:00-1:59 respectively. 以下建模是否是正确的方式来表示重复发生的事件,该事件发生在每年的4月和5月的前1,2小时(即分别在00:00-00:59和1:00-1:59)。

在此处输入图片说明

From the paper that you linked to, I think one of the important parts is (emphasis added): 从您链接到的论文中,我认为其中一个重要部分是(强调):

In order to encode the temporal aggregates ontology in OWL, we first defined temporal sequence. 为了在OWL中编码时间集合本体,我们首先定义时间序列。 It has only one optional property hasMemeber [sic] which maps from a temporal sequence to any temporal thing. 它只有一个可选属性hasMemeber [sic],它从时间序列映射到任何时间事物。

So, it can have any temporal thing as a value. 因此,它可以具有任何临时性的东西作为值。 The question is whether TemporalSeq is actually a TemporalThing or not. 问题是TemporalSeq是否实际上是TemporalThing。 The snippet shown in the paper doesn't show it as a subclass of TemporalSeq, and the ontology link appear dead. 本文中显示的摘录未将其显示为TemporalSeq的子类,并且本体链接似乎已失效。 However, I found what I think is another copy at http://ontology.ihmc.us/temporalAggregates.owl . 但是,我在http://ontology.ihmc.us/temporalAggregates.owl找到了我认为的另一份副本。 It doesn't appear to make TemporalSeq a subclass of TemporalThing (renamed to TemporalEntity?), either, so I don't think that TemporalSeq is supposed to be a TemporalThing/TemporalEntity. 它似乎也没有使TemporalSeq成为TemporalThing的子类(重命名为TemporalEntity?),所以我不认为TemporalSeq应该是TemporalThing / TemporalEntity。

A CIDOC model of recurring events would require both a TemporalSeq (a recurring time span) and a disjoint persistent concept to define the observation of the second occurrence as related to the first. 重复事件的CIDOC模型将需要TemporalSeq(重复时间跨度)和不相交的持久性概念,以将对第二次事件的观察定义为与第一次事件有关。 It seems that OWL is defining event frequency as a single recurring pattern of time as a single event aggregate, that contains sub events. 似乎OWL正在将事件频率定义为包含子事件的单个事件集合的单个重复时间模式。

The endurant concept of the measured periodicity of an event cannot be modeled with TemporalSeq aggregation and seem to extend outside of TemporalThing completely. 测量事件的周期性的持久概念无法用TemporalSeq聚合建模,并且似乎完全扩展到TemporalThing之外。 Your reference paper uses holiday as an example and I actually have a problem with modelling "Holiday" as a recurring event. 您的参考文件以假日为例,实际上我对将“假日”建模为重复事件存在问题。 "A holiday" is a recurring event in a temporal sequence, but it is also a concept. “假期”是按时间顺序重复发生的事件,但这也是一个概念。 Every time "a holiday" occurs it is a new event, that event is part of a aggregate temporal sequence of events. 每当“假期”发生时,这都是一个新事件,该事件是事件总时间序列的一部分。 The recurrence pattern of the instances of "holiday" is a persistent concept called "Holiday" that cannot be reasoned as a temporal sequence or event. “假日”实例的重复模式是一个持久性概念,称为“假日”,不能作为时间序列或事件进行推理。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM