[英]can hamcrest “hasItem” get few matchers?
assertThat( myClass.getMyItems(), contains(
hasProperty("foo", is("bar")),
hasProperty("name", is("bar"))
));
and 和
assertThat(logsFromWaze, hasItem(
hasProperty("foo", is("bar")),
hasProperty("name", is("bar"))));
how can it work? 如何运作?
doesn't hasItem
expect one matcher as an argument and not a list of matchers? hasItem
是否不希望将一个匹配器作为参数而不是匹配器列表?
There is no hasItem
matcher that accepts varargs, but you can combine both hasProperty("foo", is("bar"))
and hasProperty("name", is("bar"))
via allOf
matcher: 没有hasItem
接受可变参数匹配,但你可以结合两种hasProperty("foo", is("bar"))
和hasProperty("name", is("bar"))
通过allOf
匹配:
assertThat(logsFromWaze, hasItem(
allOf(
hasProperty("foo", is("bar")),
hasProperty("name", is("bar"))
)
));
This test will succeed when a single pass over the examined Iterable
yields at least one item that matches all of the matchers passed to allOf
. 单次通过检查的Iterable
时,如果通过至少一个与传递给allOf
所有匹配项匹配的项,则此测试将成功。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.