简体   繁体   English

为什么ls和ls -l linux命令之间的计数不同?

[英]Why count differs between ls and ls -l linux command?

I had a directory with number of files and need to check the count of files present in it. 我的目录中包含文件数量,需要检查其中的文件数量。

I tried the following two commands: 我尝试了以下两个命令:

ls | wc -l
ls -l | wc -l

and found there are differences while using both commands. 并发现使用这两个命令时存在差异。 (ie. number of files is greater in the usage of second command while comparing to the first command.) (即,与第一条命令相比,第二条命令的使用率更高。)

I would like to know the changes happening in the both commands. 我想知道两个命令中发生的更改。

From man ls : 来自man ls

-l      (The lowercase letter ``ell''.)  List in long format.  (See below.)  If the output is to a terminal, a total sum for all the file sizes is output on a line before the
         long listing.

So ls -l adds a header line stating the "total" size of files: 所以ls -l添加了一个标题行,指出文件的“总”大小:

$ ls -l /
total 65
-r--r--r--   1 root  wheel  6197 May 11 21:57 COPYRIGHT
drwxr-xr-x   2 root  wheel  1024 Jun  1 16:02 bin
drwxr-xr-x   9 root  wheel  1536 Jun  1 16:02 boot
dr-xr-xr-x   8 root  wheel   512 Jul  7 20:16 dev
.......

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM