[英]Initializing boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<T>> with boost::shared_ptr<std::list<T>>
I would like to initialize a boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<std::string> > vec
in the constructor initialize list with an boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> > list
? 我想用
boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> > list
在构造函数初始化列表中初始化boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<std::string> > vec
?
Is it possible? 可能吗?
I tried this: 我试过这个:
Test.hpp Test.hpp
class Test
{
public:
Test(boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> > list);
private:
boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<std::string> > vec;
};
Test.cpp TEST.CPP
Test::Test(boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> > list) : vec(list->begin(), list->end())
{
}
Part of error message: 部分错误消息:
Test.cpp: In constructor ‘Test::Test(boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::basic_string<char> > >)’:
Test.cpp:6:85: error: no matching function for call to ‘boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<std::basic_string<char> > >::shared_ptr(std::list<std::basic_string<char> >::iterator, std::list<std::basic_string<char> >::iterator)’
Replace: 更换:
vec(list->begin(), list->end())
with: 有:
vec(boost::make_shared(list->begin(), list->end()))
Your constructor should looks like: 您的构造函数应如下所示:
Test::Test(const boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> >& list) :
vec(boost::make_shared(list->begin(), list->end())){
}
Be aware that you are copying the data from the std::list
to the std::vector
. 请注意,您正在将数据从
std::list
复制到std::vector
。
If you want less expensive solution, you could move them using std::make_move_iterator
. 如果您想要更便宜的解决方案,可以使用
std::make_move_iterator
移动它们。 However, since you still using boost smart pointers, I think that you do not have access to it. 但是,由于您仍然使用boost智能指针,我认为您无法访问它。
Edit: 编辑:
if it did not work try this: 如果它不起作用试试这个:
vec(boost::make_shared<std::vector<std::string>>(list->begin(), list->end()))
Edit 2: 编辑2:
In order to cover the nullptr
case as it was mentioned by @Maxim Egorushkin: 为了覆盖@Maxim Egorushkin提到的
nullptr
案例:
class Test{
public:
Test(const boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> >& list);
private:
boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<std::string> > convert_to_vec(const boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> >& lst) const;
boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<std::string> > vec;
};
//in .cpp
Test::Test(const boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> >& list):
vec(convert_to_vec(list)){
}
boost::shared_ptr<std::vector<std::string> > Test::convert_to_vec(const boost::shared_ptr<std::list<std::string> >& lst) const{
if(lst!=nullptr){
return boost::make_shared<std::vector<std::string>>(list->begin(), list->end());
}
return nullptr;
}
As a side note: it is not clear why the constructor takes shared_ptr<X>
but does not use the shared_ptr<X>
. 作为旁注:不清楚为什么构造函数采用
shared_ptr<X>
但不使用shared_ptr<X>
。 It should take X&
instead. 它应该采取
X&
而不是。 Avoid using smart-pointers if possible. 尽可能避免使用智能指针。
Ideally, your code should look like: 理想情况下,您的代码应如下所示:
class Test
{
public:
Test(std::list<std::string> const& list)
: vec(list.begin(), list.end())
{}
private:
std::vector<std::string> vec;
};
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.