[英]Closure compiler annotations for an object containing a constructor function
I'm trying to typecheck a library that returns an Object of constructor functions.我正在尝试对返回构造函数对象的库进行类型检查。 With the following code Closure errors with:
使用以下代码关闭错误:
./my-app.js:11: ERROR - Cannot call non-function type Foo.Wheel
const wheel = new Foo.Wheel();
^
Here's the code structure:下面是代码结构:
my-app-code.js - The code I'm using my-app-code.js - 我正在使用的代码
const Foo = /** @type{!Foo.Module} */ require('foo');
const wheel = new Foo.Wheel();
wheel.rotate();
externs-foo.js - Closure externs for the Foo library externs-foo.js - Foo 库的关闭 externs
/** @const */
const Foo = {};
/** @record */
Foo.Module = function() {};
/** @type {!Foo.Wheel} */
Foo.Module.prototype.Wheel;
/** @constructor */
Foo.Wheel = function() {};
/**
* @returns {void}
*/
Foo.Wheel.prototype.rotate = function() {};
foo/index.js - corresponds to Foo.Module type. foo/index.js - 对应于 Foo.Module 类型。
module.exports = {
Wheel: require("./wheel"),
};
foo/wheel.js - corresponds to Foo.Wheel. foo/wheel.js - 对应于 Foo.Wheel。
function Wheel() {}
Wheel.prototype.rotate = function() {};
module.exports = Wheel;
I tried one variation on externs-foo.js
with the following results.我在
externs-foo.js
上尝试了一种变体,结果如下。
Make Foo.module.prototype.Wheel
a function使
Foo.module.prototype.Wheel
成为一个函数
/** @return {!Foo.Wheel} */
Foo.Module.prototype.Wheel = function() {};
Errors with:错误:
my-app.js:11: ERROR - Expected a constructor but found type function(this:Foo.Module):Foo.Wheel.
const wheel = new Foo.Wheel();
my-app.js:13: ERROR - Property rotate never defined on module$myapp_Foo of type Foo.Module
wheel.rotate();
I'm aware of two solutions to this issue:我知道这个问题的两个解决方案:
Foo.Module.prototype.Wheel = Foo.Wheel;
Foo.Module.prototype.Wheel = Foo.Wheel;
in the externs file.@type {function(new:Foo.Wheel)}
, which says that the function is in fact a constructor that instantiates a Foo.Wheel object.@type {function(new:Foo.Wheel)}
,它表示该函数实际上是一个实例化 Foo.Wheel 对象的构造函数。 I prefer solution #1 because it declares a reference to the constructor function, so the compiler will allow me to access properties of the constructor (eg static methods).我更喜欢解决方案#1,因为它声明了对构造函数的引用,因此编译器将允许我访问构造函数的属性(例如静态方法)。 IIRC this can't be done in solution #2.
IIRC 这不能在解决方案#2 中完成。
The annotations @type {!Foo.Wheel}
and @return {!Foo.Wheel}
won't work because they refer to an instance of Foo.Wheel
and what you actually want is the constructor itself.注释
@type {!Foo.Wheel}
和@return {!Foo.Wheel}
不起作用,因为它们引用Foo.Wheel
的实例,而您真正想要的是构造函数本身。
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.