简体   繁体   English

PDF / A-1b +可访问性是否等同于PDF / A-1a?

[英]Is PDF/A-1b + accessibility equal to PDF/A-1a?

we are creating accessible PDFs through our software. 我们正在通过我们的软件创建可访问的PDF。 Currently, we are complaint with PDF/A-1b standard. 目前,我们投诉PDF / A-1b标准。 Recently, we have started supporting accessibility also(compliant with Matterhorn Protocol). 最近,我们也开始支持可访问性(符合Matterhorn协议)。 So can we now say our PDFs produced are PDF/A-1a compliant ? 那么我们现在可以说我们生产的PDF是否符合PDF / A-1a标准? (assume all PDF/A-1b features are supported and new PDFs are PDF/UA compliant as per matterhorn protocol) (假设支持所有PDF / A-1b功能,并且根据马特宏协议,新PDF符合PDF / UA标准)

PS: I tried online PDF/A validators but they are not reliable. PS:我尝试过在线PDF / A验证器,但它们不可靠。 I am saying this because I tried their tools with PDF/A-1a compliant files (matterhorn reference PDF files) that are used as reference files by developer/testers, were also marked non-compliant by those tools. 我这样说是因为我尝试了他们的工具与PDF / A-1a兼容的文件(马特宏参考PDF文件),这些文件被开发人员/测试人员用作参考文件,也被这些工具标记为不合规。 So i am looking for a quick answer so that I don't have to go through long process of finding a reliable validator (plus that might be a paid software :) ). 所以我正在寻找一个快速的答案,以便我不必经历寻找可靠验证器的长期过程(加上可能是付费软件:))。

This question is confusing PDF/A , PDF/UA , and their intersection. 这个问题令人困惑的是PDF / APDF / UA及其交集。

To clear things up, PDF/A-1 refers to the ISO 19005-1 specification from 2005, which places additional requirements and restrictions on the PDF version 1.4 specification to make PDF documents suitable for long term archiving. 为了清楚起见, PDF / A-1引用了2005年的ISO 19005-1规范,该规范对PDF版本1.4规范提出了额外的要求和限制,以使PDF文档适合长期存档。 PDF/A-2 refers to the ISO 19005-2 specification from 2011 which re-bases the PDF/A specification off of the ISO 32000-1:2008 version of the PDF v1.7 specification. PDF / A-2是指从2011年ISO 19005-2规范其重新基地PDF / A规范关的ISO 32000-1:2008PDF V1.7规范。

PDF/UA-1 refers to the ISO 14289-1 specification from 2012 which places additional requirements and restrictions on the ISO 32000-1:2008 specification to make PDF documents accessible for assistive technology. PDF / UA-1引用了2012年的ISO 14289-1规范,该规范对ISO 32000-1:2008规范提出了额外的要求和限制,以使PDF文档用于辅助技术。

It is possible, but not necessarily easy, to make a PDF v1.7 document comply to both PDF/UA-1 and PDF/A-2 so that it is both accessible and ready for long-term archiving. 使PDF v1.7文档符合PDF / UA-1和PDF / A-2是可能的,但不一定容易,因此它既可以访问又可以进行长期存档。

However, it is also possible to make a PDF/A document that can't ever conform to PDF/UA. 但是,也可以制作一个不能符合PDF / UA的PDF / A文档。 PDF/A has conformance levels a and b (ignoring u) where the essential difference is that 'a' requires that a PDF document be tagged, while 'b' does not. PDF / A具有一致性级别 a和b(忽略u),其中本质区别在于'a'要求标记PDF文档,而'b'则不标记。

Tagged PDF is discussed in section 14.8 of the ISO 32000-1:2008 PDF specification, it builds upon sections 14.6 (Marked Content) and 14.7 (Logical Structure). 标记PDFISO 32000-1:2008 PDF规范的第14.8节中讨论,它建立在第14.6节(标记内容)和第14.7节 (逻辑结构)之上。

Note that the following section ( 14.9 Accessibility Support) is also of interest as the PDF/UA specification is all about accessibility and builds on top of all of these sections of the PDF specification: PDF/UA (among other requirements) essentially requires all content elements in a PDF to be tagged to be conformant. 请注意,以下部分( 14.9可访问性支持)也很有用,因为PDF / UA规范完全是关于可访问性的,并且构建在PDF规范的所有这些部分之上:PDF / UA(以及其他要求)基本上要求所有内容PDF中的元素被标记为符合要求。

声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.

 
粤ICP备18138465号  © 2020-2024 STACKOOM.COM