Array.prototype.slice.call（参数）vs. Array.prototype.slice.apply（参数）

Question

Previous posts have talked about how Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments) work but I don't get why you're using call instead of apply when apply is used for array-like objects whereas call is used on lists of objects separated by commas. Isn't arguments an array-like object that should used apply instead of call ?

Answer 1

If you'd like to pass arguments to slice in array instead of one by one, then there is a difference. You could do it this way

[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]  ---- our example arguments
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments, 2, 5);

here you pass to slice method 2 and 5 and these are slice arguments to indicate that you want to get items at index 1 to item at index. 4. So most likely it will be 3, 4, 5.

Array.prototype.slice.apply(arguments, [2, 5]);

This does the same but arguments for slice can be passed in an array.

Answer 2

If x is an array, then these are the same:

// find the "slice" method of an array and call it with "x" as its "this" argument
x.slice();

// find the "slice" method of an array and call it with "x" as its "this" argument
Array.prototype.slice.call(x);

The first argument of func .call is this this argument, or, the value of this inside the function. The remaining arguments are the arguments of the function (in this case there are none).

The slice method, called with no arguments, simply creates a new array with the same contents. That's what we want to do when we do Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments) , however, since arguments isn't an array and therefore has no slice method attach to itself, we have to use the second of the two methods to get the slice method of an array , and then apply that to something that's not an array:

// find the "slice" method of an array and call it with "arguments",
// which is *not* an array, as its "this" argument
Array.prototype.slice.call(arguments);