是否可以将std :: condition_variable与std :: lock_guard一起使用？

Question

I am using a std::condition_variable combined with a std::unique_lock like this.

std::mutex a_mutex;
std::condition_variable a_condition_variable;
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> a_lock(a_mutex);
a_condition_variable.wait(a_lock, [this] {return something;});
//Do something
a_lock.unlock();

It works fine. As I understand, std::condition_variable accepts a std::unique_lock for it to wait. But, I am trying to combine it with std::lock_guard but not able to.

My question is: Is it possible to replace std::unique_lock with a std::lock_guard instead ? This can relieve me from manually unlocking the lock every time I use it.

Answer 1

No, a std::unique_lock is needed if it is used with std::condition_variable . std::lock_guard may have less overhead, but it cannot be used with std::condition_variable .

But the std::unique_lock doesn't need to be manually unlocked, it also unlocks when it goes out of scope, like std::lock_guard . So the waiting code could be written as:

std::mutex a_mutex;
std::condition_variable a_condition_variable;
{
    std::unique_lock<std::mutex> a_lock(a_mutex);
    a_condition_variable.wait(a_lock, [this] {return something;});
    //Do something
}

See http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/thread/unique_lock

Answer 2

Any call to wait() on a condition variable will always need to lock() and unlock() the underlying mutex . Since the wrapper lock_guard<> does not provide these functions, it can never be used with wait() .

Still you could write your own simple mutex wrapper based on lock_guard<> , and add the 2 necessary methods. Additionally you would have to use condition_variable_any , which accepts any lock/mutex with a lock()/unlock() interface:

#include <mutex>

template<typename _mutex_t>
class my_lock_guard
{
public:
    explicit my_lock_guard(_mutex_t & __m) : __mutex(__m)
    { __mutex.lock(); }

    my_lock_guard(_mutex_t & __m, std::adopt_lock_t) : __mutex(__m)
    { } // calling thread owns mutex

    ~my_lock_guard()
    { __mutex.unlock(); }

    void lock()
    { __mutex.lock(); }

    void unlock()
    { __mutex.unlock(); }   

    my_lock_guard(const my_lock_guard &) = delete;
    my_lock_guard& operator=(const my_lock_guard &) = delete;

private:
    _mutex_t &  __mutex;
};

And then:

#include <condition_variable>
...
std::mutex m;
my_lock_guard<std::mutex> lg(m);
std::condition_variable_any cva;
cva.wait(lg, [] { return something;});  
// do something ...
...

Answer 3

Impossible, but you don't actually need that.

std::unique_lock automatically unlocks itself in destructor , if it was locked.