[英]Why not declaring a variable as an argument of a function?
I don't see that in any shorthand technique or stackOverflow questions..then I wonder if the following can be a shorthand technique. 我在任何速记技术或stackOverflow问题中都没有看到这一点,那么我想知道以下内容是否可以作为速记技术。
Imagine I have a function which I know there is exactly 1 argument that will be passed to it : 想象一下,我有一个函数,我知道将有1个参数传递给它:
function myFunc(arr) {
var i;
for(i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
if(arr[i] === 3) {return true;}
}
}
Is it a good practice in that case to write : 在这种情况下,写这样的好习惯吗?
function myFunc(arr, i) {
for(i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
if(arr[i] === 3) {return true;}
}
}
I know that in most case we only save 4 bytes and this represent a very small improvement but sometimes for a short function it can be more readable without wasting 1/2 lines just to declare variables. 我知道,在大多数情况下,我们只保存4个字节,这仅是很小的改进,但有时对于短函数而言,它更易读,而不会浪费1/2行来声明变量。
Edit: also I want to declare i in the scope of the function and not in the for
loop sinc I want to be able to reuse it. 编辑:我也想在函数范围内声明i,而不是在
for
循环sinc中声明我希望能够重用它。
You would only do this if you were going to actually use i
in the for
loop. 仅当您要在
for
循环中实际使用i
,才需要这样做。
eg: 例如:
function myFunc(arr, i) {
for(i; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
arr[i];
}
}
// Why you would do this though, is another matter (and bizarre)
myFunc(anArray, 9);
Instead, it would be better to do: 相反,最好这样做:
function myFunc(arr) {
for(var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
arr[i];
}
}
and not worry about 4 bytes... 不用担心4个字节...
声明:本站的技术帖子网页,遵循CC BY-SA 4.0协议,如果您需要转载,请注明本站网址或者原文地址。任何问题请咨询:yoyou2525@163.com.